Friday, 28 December 2012

Important: Sandy Hook guns: BUSTED?!

(Please also read post of Dec. 9, 2012)



New article about the guns:
PLEASE READ

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/27/sandy-hook-huge-hoax-and-anti-gun-psy-op/

And note:

 There were 3 other guns reported found SOMEWHERE, named as "Authorities also recovered three other guns — a Henry repeating rifle, an Enfield rifle and a shotgun. It was not clear exactly where those weapons were found" in an AP article at http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jQFVxPi4y0Pr-qGlyqGmnxLYGxHA?docId=e7547b1a4be04ff9829ddb39f606d2a5


UPDATES FOR THE ARTICLE on VETERANS TODAY by Kollerstrom and Fetzer:
[They've now included these points for me -- Dec. 28]

1.
NBC News claim that there were not 2 but 4 handguns inside school and NO long gun.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKzkqytjuDg

2.
And here are 2 SHORT items I hope they add right into text:

In the Lt. Vance Sandy Hook press briefing, a reporter asks about the mother of Adam Lanza. The question is whether she was related to the school or if she was. Vance pauses more than a moment, then speaks at some length about the man arrested in Camouflage and released (no significant details given there, either), with nary a word about the mother. The reporters then, hypnotized in the simple sense, not in a technical formal sense, away from the fact they didn't hear an answer, start shouting other questions. He has deflected them. Note his slight smiles at points while he discusses the camo guy not the mother. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZRJ_2tFBnt4

He also says to another reporter in a personal interview that the investigation will take months. Yet, what more will WE be told? And before that, we hear him say the most difficult thing is when a reporter has a question that he's not prepared to answer, "for whatever reason". http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2m8-RYz0Yjk

Saturday, 22 December 2012

Experiment real: MKUltra assassins= real

(Please also read post of Dec. 9, 2012)




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oC9J6O6soHA

Finally. The first public and daring and smart experiment which proves even to disbelieving hypnotherapy experimenters from universities, that a man can be hypnotized to kill -- and even against his personality type.

Polka dots (like RFK death and polka-dotted dress on woman) are used (though the woman's dress may or may not have been part of a suggestion to Sirhan Sirhan); dissociation to feel he's on a shooting range, not hitting a person (just as Sirhan Sirhan feels).


Note: Sirhan Sirhan did not fire the kill shots anyway, but he did fire something. The kill shot was near point-blank (left burn marks) and was in opposite ear to where Sirhan was. The security guard was outfitted with same gun type as Sirhan. For info on the way they made sure the death went through but Sirhan was framed, see http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.ca/2010/06/jfk-and-rfk-plots-that-killed-them.html and http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.ca/2010/10/rfk-outing-cia-at-ambassador_22.html

But the point is that this man in the video will kill and has no memory or personality to do so.


Bless you, Derren Brown and Stephen Fry for helping to bring this to the level of empiric proof.


Friday, 21 December 2012

Police radio: says "END THE LIFE OF ADAM" @22:55 mins

(Please also read post of Dec. 9, 2012)




Police radio, 22:55 min's: "END THE LIFE OF ADAM"
Sandy Hook, Newtown CT shooting

Low-toned but clear as a bell, on the Police/Fire/911 radio, someone says: "End [small pause] the life of Adam".

Someone just brought this to my attention ... he's right. The word "End" is slightly muffled but there. The tone of voice and "... the life of Adam" make it even clearer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETkrxfYoQtc

Send this to your people and GRAB THE AUDIO BEFORE IT'S ALTERED; spread virally ... before the account might be shut down.

.................

Is this a hoax? Is this real audio? Here's my thought on the matter:

A hoaxter would more likely pick a more predictable angry statement to mimic: "Get Alex" or something. "End the life of ..." is formal, and is used for statements ... but not typically used so not like a hoaxter to bother with.

As such, it might well be something someone with a moment free to think, not reacting intensely, would perhaps come up with, to obscure himself a bit on the radio or knowing the radio was on. It's not outlandish, but it's obscurantist: something an English speaker might well use to feel less obvious. Ironically, it takes more time to say and thus is clearer, but psychology works more on feelings: if it feels awkward, it might well be a choice someone made.

MOST slip-ups (and hoaxes, of course, too) would be simpler and direct. But under some circumstances, an awkward phrase itself would be a natural choice if someone were trying to hide the obvious.

This is a different situation than when an awkward phrase simply does not fit and shows a forgery: something being completely out of a person's character. THIS has a psychological reason for its awkwardness: when people try to cover up something, they often get more awkward in that moment.

.................


I give honour to "dee jay" for pointing this out on Youtube to someone and how my blog got into the mention as well!

Here is the conversation, from "Connecticut Shooting Victim "Emilie Parker" Father Speaks" posted by loudmothcha44 at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJLc2Ts9veU&lc=LWmUJtrSBB_Re1ZzV365-DYU40Sx53leindFxkFxYFU --- NOTE: this version of the speech cuts off the totally relaxed laughing and pushing-up of emotions in this man (not pushing down emotions); his non-reaction in reading the line about his recently dead wife from an auto accident and his slight smiles and normal voice creeping through much of the beginning section remain however. Perhaps this was an empty classroom and mostly fake rolls of children, ready for a drill, and ordered at high levels (say, Holder?).



dee jay 11 hours ago

-done after small arms treaty

-james holmes dad and assailants dad have been charged with coorperate scandal involving offshore banking

-no evidence has ever been provided, no photos after act, no ballistic reports, no security images of assailant, no witnesses that saw him there

-the coranor was caught lieing, and outright said he could manipulate the crimescene

-the media was countlessly wrong about the identity of the assailant, and the numbers of assailants

Reply ·







boobah1067 11 hours ago

Principal called in to Newtown Bee, saying the shooting went "on and on" and then she's supposedly dead first, shot execution-style? Newtown Bee news has pulled the story: youcanknowsometimes. blogspot. ca
Reply ·

in reply to dee jay





dee jay 11 hours ago

watch?v=ETkrxfYoQtc

22:55
Reply ·

in reply to boobah1067





boobah1067 9 hours ago

Sounds like "the life of that". I can't make it out.
Reply ·

in reply to dee jay





dee jay 9 hours ago

"end the life of adam"
Reply ·

in reply to boobah1067





boobah1067 2 hours ago

Oh. ---- And you know, just listening to this a-hole actor (I have no doubt now), I hear him breathing so hard, but it's not in the middle of a statement where he's hurting ... and where it would be natural. He DOES start to cry when speaking of the daughter. But it's a hard-breathing to start. But not like he's getting an emotion suddenly. Aside: He's so looking forward to the money, this spook or whatever he is.
Reply ·

in reply to dee jay





dee jay 1 hour ago

please copy and paste the points i made to any sandy hook videos you see on youtube, and add as much information to it as you can, but only if its viable. please please please help me spread the message, this is bullshit and the american public shouldnt just be willing to accept anything their media tells them. this should be the first step in a long line of questioning authority. pllleeeaaasse help
Reply ·

in reply to boobah1067





boobah1067 1 second ago

DONE. It's out there. And have someone put it at a blog: youcanknowsometimes.blogspot.com ---- I wanted to save it and have others save it before Tweeting, etc. All the big researchers know now. Barrett, Fetzer, Duff, Tarpley, ... etc. -- FYI: I wonder if it was an empty classroom for a drill (gone live) & a fake roll of students, w/ a few deaths. Honest police would've been sent out back, not knowing real toll inside. Send blogsite to your friends b/c they could pull the audio/modify it.
Reply ·

in reply to dee jay





dee jay 8 minutes ago

thanks. keep posting these facts on youtube videos if you want to help out as much as you can. im not stopping, i cant.
Reply ·

in reply to boobah1067 (Show the comment)





dee jay 1 minute ago

i appreciate the effort and help.

sincerley,
Reply ·

in reply to boobah1067 (Show the comment)

Thursday, 20 December 2012

Newtown: principal WAS ALVE! phoned news

(Please also read post of Dec. 9, 2012)


Newtown Bombshell: principal alive called news?, now dead

Fake news? Mistaken identity? Why not issue corrections instead of pulling the story?


UPDATE Dec. 22, 2012: THE ARTICLE WASN'T FROM SOTT, BUT FROM VETERANS TODAY. I have updated it here.



BOMBSHELL: Newtown Bee News had article of PRINCIPAL SAYING shooting "went on and on" but ... now stories say she was killed at the outset, execution style. How did she give an interview to the press? Was she killed later to shut her up?


This is one of the points in the article. It's sourced with an image of original article in the Newtown Bee.

I am copying the article print in full below, with inserted reference info on all Youtube videos linked in it. I do this for posterity. (I also put a post with the same article in it, as "missing reports", because some people would click on that title and some on this title.)

...........................................................


Sandy Hook massacre: Official story spins out of control

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/20/sandy-hook-massacre-official-story-spins-out-of-control/
Niall Bradley
Sott.net
Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:21 CST


[Image. Caption: "Teddy bears left at a memorial for the child victims of the Sandy Hook massacre" ]


The massacre of 20 children and 7 adults at the Sandy Hook elementary school last Friday was one more in a long line of atrocious mass murders committed in the USA. By now, four days later, an official version of events has more or less solidified to explain the chain of events. The familiar 'lone gunman' narrative has once more stoked the hot-button issue of gun control and left the general population as clueless as ever as to why people suddenly 'go postal' and target the most vulnerable members of society.

On closer inspection, however, there is clearly more to many of these mass shootings than meets the eye. Very often the earliest reports present information that directly contradicts key foundations of the final 'official' analysis of events. Granted, confusion is natural when a story breaks, but some of the initial reports conflict so completely with the lone gunman narrative that I'm going to compile them here and then try to put this tragedy in a more objective context. In his speech at the Sandy Hook Interfaith Prayer Vigil in Newtown, Connecticut on Sunday night, President Obama quoted the following biblical passage:
"So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal."

~ 2 Corinthians 4:18
The traumatised Newtown community deserves the facts without the spin. Everyone touched by this brutal event deserves to know what really happened, so let's fix our eyes on what remains unseen...

A 20-year-old 'tech geek' named Adam Lanza is supposed to have snapped early last Friday, December 14th, shot dead his mother Nancy Lanza, loaded her car up with her guns and ammo, then driven it across town to his former school, the Sandy Hook Elementary School, shot dead 27 people in two classrooms and an adjoining hallway, then turned one of his guns on himself.

That's how most will now remember the shooting, but is that actually what happened?

All the child victims were first-graders between the ages of 6 and 7. If there's any saving grace to be found in this event, it's that it was all over within minutes. Police were reportedly on the scene "instantaneously" and by then the shooting had ended. Listed among the slain school teachers and administrative staff was the school principal, 47-year-old Dawn Hochsprung. Right here we encounter our first problem:

The Newtown Bee
December 14, 2012

Sandy Hook School Principal Dawn Hochsprung told The Bee that a masked man entered the school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots - more than she could count - that went "on and on."


[Image of now-missing article. Caption: © The Newtown Bee ]


How could the principal have survived to give this statement to local press describing what happened ... if she was one of the first to be killed? Incidentally, The Newtown Bee's article was taken down yesterday. Of course, a plausible explanation is that a reporter mistook another teacher for the principal.

We were initially told that two handguns - a Glock and a Sig Sauer - were found next to the body of the dead shooter, while a third weapon, a .223-caliber rifle was also recovered "in the trunk of a car" later, in the school's parking lot. All of the weapons were allegedly legally bought and registered in Nancy Lanza's name. The car was later identified as a black Honda, also registered in her name. More weapons have since been introduced to the story but we'll get back to those later on.

Besides anonymous 'law enforcement officials' telling the media that Adam Lanza was a former pupil at the school, they also said his mother was currently a teacher there, that she was found among the dead and that her son had specifically sought out her classroom first. But when it emerged that teaching staff at the school had never heard of a Nancy Lanza, it was suggested that she was a substitute teacher whose name therefore mightn't appear on staff lists.

But this claim too has disappeared down the memory hole because it's now known that neither Nancy nor her son had any connection with the school whatsoever. Adam Lanza was in fact home-schooled. Nancy Lanza has since been painted as a "survivalist" who loved firearms, taught her sons how to shoot and was "stockpiling" because she was "worried about economic collapse."

Daily Mail, UK
December 16, 2012

Last night it also emerged Nancy was a member of the Doomsday Preppers movement, which believes people should prepare for end of the world.

Her former sister-in-law Marsha said she had turned her home 'into a fortress'. She added: 'Nancy had a survivalist philosophy which is why she was stockpiling guns. She had them for defense.

'She was stockpiling food. She grew up on a farm in New Hampshire. She was skilled with guns. We talked about preppers and preparing for the economy collapsing.'
It's not difficult to see that their efforts to insinuate that Nancy Lanza was somehow responsible for this massacre by being an irresponsible mother also serve to rile the large contingent of gun owners in the country, particularly the far right who see a conspiracy on the government's part to "take back our guns." More on that later, but for now I just want to note that all of the Lanza family members seemed to live more or less normal middle-class lives. Yes, the parents were divorced but it was apparently amicable and both put their own needs second to those of their children (and anyway, divorce in the US these days is decidedly 'normal middle class').

Despite "family insiders" claiming that he was a "deeply disturbed kid", Adam Lanza, like so many other alleged 'lone(r) gunmen' before him, does not fit the profile of a mass-murdering maniac. His 24-year-old brother, Ryan Lanza, said he hadn't seen his brother since 2010. This fact brings into question Ryan's claim that his younger brother may have had his identity card on his person at the school shooting. Although perhaps the question that needs to be asked here is, why would a person bother to carry identification with them after going to the trouble of dressing up in a bullet-proof vest, mask and black camouflage gear and going on a killing spree ...

The live emergency services audio feed from the scene reveals some interesting observations from first responders that have been completely overlooked by the mainstream media. Note that the unedited version lasts over two hours, so the abridged version I'm going to quote from has a compressed sequence of events that are not in real time. In this abridged version, we hear at 1.38' a report that gunfire is still being heard, even though the shooting was supposed to have ended by the time police arrived. The next report at 2.35' says that the shooting has stopped and the school is "in lockdown". At 3.23', the police relay a teacher's report that she saw "two shadows running past the gym" [not "two shooters", as we previously reported on SOTT.net]. This is followed by another officer on the scene who says, "Yeh, we got 'em, they're coming at me! ... [inaudible] ... Coming up the driveway real slowly!" That same officer at 5.40' says he has them "proned out", which presumably means he has apprehended them and they are laid out on the ground, before another officer comes on to say, "be aware that we do have a second [inaudible] ..."

Later on, at 19.10', an officer who sounds out of breath, like he's just given chase, reports what I think sounds like "these guys" followed certainly by "multiple weapons, including long rifles and shotgun". If these were found so early on, why were they not included in the initial press reports which stated that three firearms had been found - the above mentioned Glock, Sig Sauer and Bushmaster AR-15 rifle? Further conflicting, and possibly planted evidence was thrown into the mix by 'law enforcement officials' when they published video footage of a long weapon being retrieved from the trunk of a car. Look closely and you'll see that it's a shotgun, not a rifle. In addition, this 'discovery' was made late in the day (it's dark outside), while the Bushmaster rifle was first reported found in the trunk of a car much earlier in the day.

Besides the above two suspects "proned out" in front of the school, another suspected gunman was apprehended after he gave chase, this time in the woods next to the school:


[Video "4th Shooter Discovered? Two Not One in Woods Behind Sandy Hook Elementary School"
 40-41 seconds. Mid-grey figure shows between trees. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=An1yHCzdNhQ
Uploaded by greenback001 ]



The police are clearly chasing someone whom they appear to apprehend in the middle of the woods next to the school, a fact confirmed by several eyewitnesses:


[Video "Police Walked A Man In Camo Pants And Dark Jacket Out Of Woods: Newton Connecticut School Shooting" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovspEgeMXb4 Uploaded by HistoricalRecordsVLT ]


This fleeing suspect, wearing camouflage gear, a bulletproof vest and armed with four guns, has since disappeared from media coverage. Who was this person and how did he know what "it" was when he protested that "I didn't do it"?

Perhaps most astonishingly, this suspect arrested in the woods was named in an Associated Press report as 24-year-old Ryan Lanza. The original report has long since vanished of course, but you can see it referenced here. This was despite the fact that Ryan had already been named as the deceased suspect inside the school, lying next to two handguns.

Ryan Lanza was actually at work in Hoboken, New Jersey, that morning when his name and photo began circulating in the media. And so, for most of Friday, the 'lone shooter' was erroneously reported as "Ryan Lanza, confirmed dead." At the same time, we were being told that Ryan's girlfriend and a room-mate were reported missing, also from Hoboken, New Jersey.

So this isn't just a case of mistaken identity, as later claimed when it was suggested that Adam had a piece of identification belonging to his brother on his person. Not one, but BOTH Lanza brothers were being placed by 'law enforcement officials' at the scene of the shooting. It could be that Ryan's quick reflexes to leave his workplace to get on a bus to go back to his apartment while protesting innocence via his Facebook page may have saved his life.

Now remember, all of this confusion somehow resulted from a single guy going into a school and shooting children and teachers and then shooting himself, all within three minutes. Surely it should have been fairly easy to rapidly and concretely identify the details of such a crime and the scene.

What it's starting to look like is that the Lanzas were framed for this mass shooting in advance. Long before any suspects were named, and even as we were being told that Nancy Lanza was among the dead at the school, we were told that police were investigating a murder in ... Hoboken, New Jersey, where a body had been found at the home of ... Ryan Lanza! An older "confirmed" version of events had RYAN, not Adam, travelling to Hoboken that morning to murder his father before going to the school in Newtown, Connecticut. Other variants had Ryan OR Adam going to both their divorced parents' homes and killing them before going to the school.

The narrative has now settled on the younger brother killing his mother in Newtown then going to the school. So what about the rest of it? Do we just put it down to 'keen' journalism that was having a field day last Friday as media outlets sought to bring us the latest 'breaking news'? Confusion and 'Chinese whispers' undoubtedly play a part in the early stages of national media events, but I think back to those news anchors reading scripts about Osama Bin Laden within minutes of the first plane being hit on 9/11 and I think, 'Wait a minute!' All these misleading reports had to have been issued by someone or some people "confirming" to Associated Press and other media outlets that the Ryans's father had been murdered [he wasn't even aware that the shooting at the school had taken place until journalists turned up on his doorstep], or that Ryan's girlfriend had gone missing from Hoboken, or that either Ryan or Adam were pulled out of the adjacent woods in handcuffs yelling "I DIDN'T DO IT" to assembled parents. These aren't just 'little details' that can be confused for other details, these are detailed narratives. So how, or why, would any member of the press come up with such details? They strike me as a set of alternative scenarios that might have found their way into the official narrative had facts on the ground turned out differently.

Watch this snippet of State Police Lt. Paul Vance at the press conference he gave the day after the shootings. His answer is as bizarre as it is revealing. When asked whether Nancy Lanza had any connection with the school, he replied defensively about something that is both unrelated and arguably the most significant fact that completely undermines the official narrative: the arrest of a second gunman in the woods:



[Video "Bizarre Glitch During Q&A At The 8am Press Conference (12/15) :Newtown Connecticut School Shooting" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qid9sE51d1k Uploaded by HistoricalRecordsVLT.

Comments of uploader say:

Published on Dec 15, 2012

I noticed this in the ABCNews.com version of the 8am press conference of 12/15. The reporter asks if the mother has any connection to the school, and seems to give a pre planned answer about the guy they found in the woods fitting the description of the shooter that was arrested and detained. He is indirectly claiming that he was cutting wood out there and that's why he was there. Did he live around there? Was he on his own property when they apprehended the suspected accomplice?

The glitch occurs around 10:52 into the ABC News version of the 8am press conference.
Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting: Shooter Forced Way Into School
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxz18i015tE ]



Most of the initial mainstream media reports have since been rewritten to fit 'new' facts proclaimed by 'law enforcement officials'. Here's an example from Business Insider. The following excerpts are the opening paragraphs from the 'same' article, one earlier original version, followed by the later revised version:
The massacre [...] was reportedly perpetrated with a .233 caliber rifle, a Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol.

The Bushmaster rifle was found in the trunk of the shooter's car. The Sig Sauer and Glock pistols were the only weapons used in the shooting, according to CBS. Now the question is what kind of magazine would allow a shooter to fire "100" rounds in such a short period.
Indeed, I was wondering the same thing. How could two pistols do so much damage? The report was updated as follows:
The massacre in Connecticut that's taken the lives of at least 26 people was reportedly perpetrated with a .223 caliber rifle, a Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol, according to NBC:

The shooter was using one Sig Sauer and one Glock pistol, according to CNN. Later details emerged that the primary weapon was the Bushmaster "assault-style" rifle.

Altogether, though, it doesn't matter what type of weapon the shooter used. The bottom line is that it was likely a magazine fed, semi-automatic, with enough rounds to shoot "100 shots" in a matter of minutes, as quoted in USA Today.
What actually happened may not matter to some, but surely a journalist's role is to at least try to find out?

This Associated Press/Newsday article on Saturday, December 15th, reported that "Only the rifle was used on the victims", a statement that is supported by Dr. H. Wayne Carver II, Connecticut state's chief medical examiner. Of the seven autopsies he personally performed on Sandy Hook victims, all of them had "three to 11 wounds apiece". He also said that the 'gunman' used a military-style rifle rigged to quickly reload, and that the 'shooter' was able to reload so quickly because he had "taped two magazines together." Even before the State Chief Medical Examiner had given these statements, it had been stated that spent shell casings from .233-caliber (rifle) bullets were found inside the school.

So all the victims' wounds were the result of rifle-fire, specifically from "the rifle", the one we were told in early reports was found in the trunk of a car in the parking lot! This is simply not credible.


[Image. Caption: © New York Daily News "The three guns Adam Lanza is supposed to have brought to the school with him. The rifle was left in the trunk, leaving him just the two handguns to let off 'hundreds of rounds'... firing .233 caliber bullets that belonged to the rifle... which was left in the car ]


Remember that only "the rifle" was used on all the victims. If only this rifle was used, and if we try to make this claim fit into the (admittedly fluid) official version of events, then the alleged lone gunman would have had to leave the school, place the rifle back in his trunk, then return inside the school and shoot himself. No one reported any such maneuver on the part of any gunman or gunmen. What we do have, however, is live emergency services radio feed in which we hear that two men have been apprehended and are "proned out" AND live video footage supported by eyewitness testimony showing what appears to be a THIRD man being arrested by police in the woods.

We can see how the authorities' hands are tied because they need to fit all the facts into the usual 'lone gunman' narrative. For that, there can only be ONE rifle and a couple of handguns. The problem is that they have already claimed to find that solitary Bushmaster rifle in the trunk of a car in the school parking lot, so the earliest police reports of a cache of long arms being found inside the school will no longer fit with the lone gunman narrative, especially as they're now saying that he had already opened fire as he burst into the school.

Could "scrawny" 20-year-old Adam Lanza have stormed the school, solo Rambo-style, while carrying "multiple long arms, including rifles and shotguns"? Only one person was wounded. Everyone else who was shot was killed. How could Adam Lanza achieve such deadly accuracy, in such a short length of recorded time?


[Image. Caption: "Similarly heavily armed men wearing black combat gear from head to toe... their job is to kill 'terrorists' to keep us safe, which they do by terrorising us all" ]


Initial reports put the beginning of the shooting in the school administrators' office, where someone, reportedly the school principal, had a row with the gunman(men). We know this because someone supposedly turned on the school intercom system, alerting the teaching staff to the loud swearing and commotion in the principal's office and probably saving many more children from being gunned down as teachers took measures to hide the children in closets.

One brave teacher, Kaitlin Roig, bundled a bunch of children into a bathroom and locked the door. What's interesting about her testimony to ABC News is that when police arrived and asked her to open the door, she refused, saying that "if they were really cops, they'd know where to find keys to open the door." In addition, she requested that they slide their badges under the door.

Now, this is generally a smart thing to do in any and all interactions with the police, especially in the U.S. But to have the wherewithal to do so under such traumatic circumstances strongly suggests that Ms. Roig had logically deduced by that point that multiple perpetrators were involved, and that they were either impersonating police officers or were indistinguishable from SWAT team police commandos, either in the way they dressed or the way they behaved upon entering the building. It also reminds us just how narrow the time window of the actual shooting was. The shooting appears to have barely ended when men knocked on that bathroom door and told Ms. Roig they were police.

There are also conflicting reports about how the gunmen entered the building. We were told initially that they came in through the main front entrance and proceeded straight to the administrators'/principal's offices. But Sandy Hook elementary school has a security system with a video monitor, which allows staff to screen visitors before buzzing them in. A "masked gunman dressed in black tactical combat gear" from head to toe would kinda raise red flags, don't you think?

Another possible anomaly is that Victoria Soto, one of the teachers killed at the school, appears to have had an 'in memoriam' Facebook page created in her name four days before the shooting.

Regarding this alleged 'LIBOR scandal' connection between this shooting and the Aurora theater shooting, there is as yet zero evidence to support the claim that either father of Lanza or Holmes were going to testify to anyone about anything, so for now this must remain just another rumor. I rather think that this is being spread to create the impression of a direct link that can be easily refuted, as in a straw man argument. The obvious and direct link staring everyone in the face is that the U.S. government's accounts of these events are hocus-pocus. The glaring connection between these two shootings, the Sikh Temple shooting and the Fort Hood shooting is that multiple gunmen were reported at the time by eyewitnesses, but they are now all officially claimed to have been carried out by 'lone gunmen'. This logically tells us that the real perpetrators are being protected with cover stories of what really happened because if the truth were known, some section of the U.S. government would be implicated.

Wade Michael Page, the 'lone gunman' in the Sikh Temple shooting in Wisconsin in August this year, was a highly decorated U.S. army psychological operations specialist, according to the Pentagon. But what happened to the three other gunmen seen by witnesses? It can't surely be coincidence that Wade was (former?) military psy-ops. The thought has crossed my mind more than once during the aftermath of the Connecticut shooting. Others too have suggested this was a 'false-flag' event, or that Lanza was some sort of Manchurian Candidate.

But maybe there's a simpler explanation (albeit more outrageous) than that? Was that really Adam Lanza they found inside the school? Do we even know for a fact that one of the gunmen was found dead inside the school? What we have instead are reports of two or three masked gunmen, apparently all dressed similarly in black tactical gear from head to toe, being wilfully forgotten about at best, or protected by the state at worst. Based on the authorities' persistent but futile efforts to connect the Lanzas to this school, the multiple eyewitness reports of two shooters, the Connecticut State Medical Examiner's report that all the victims were riddled with bullets from a rifle that we're simultaneously being asked to believe was in the trunk of a car the whole time, similar reports of multiple shooters in previous mass shootings in recent years and the media focusing the emotional outcry onto the hot-button topic of gun control ... I'm left wondering if this was actually the work of some highly trained professional hit team?

Was the massacre at Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, a psy-op, using what amounts to a 'death squad' and a carefully planned mission to terrorise people on behalf of the government, in combination with perception management to shape the narrative and vector the emotional fallout?

Gun control isn't the issue here. The US government would long since have taken measures, quietly, to limit the supply of weapons, the 2nd Amendment of the constitution be damned (it's "just a goddamned piece of paper", remember?), if it was really concerned with limiting civilian access to weapons.

The psychopaths in power have absolutely no compunction about using state terrorism, in this case organising the deliberate massacre of innocent children, to control people. In effect, this is little different from the U.S. government calls counter-insurgency or counter-terrorism in foreign countries, where it attacks innocent civilians to create the impression that they were killed by 'communists', 'terrorists', 'insurgents' or 'militants', with the aim of generating public support for the illusion that the common people need a strong, ruthless government to protect them from the 'evil-doers'. When the common people buy into this manipulation, the end result, as history shows repeatedly, is an overt and brutal police state.

[Image. Caption: "Niall Bradley" ]

Niall Bradley has been an editor at Sott.net since 2009. He is also an editor of Sott.net's print publication, the Dot Connector Magazine and has appeared as a guest commentator on Press TV. Niall has written numerous articles for Sott.net, where he focuses on analysing geo-political trends in the context of so-called climate change.






Disappearing reports for Newtown, referenced!

(Please also read post of Dec. 9, 2012)



Missing reports, changed stories


No-one's perfect, but check this out!
BOMBSHELL: Newtown Bee News had article of PRINCIPAL SAYING shooting "went on and on" but ... now stories say she was killed at the outset, execution style. How did she give an interview to the press? Was she killed later to shut her up?


This is one of the points in the article.
(Go to link, if you can: it has images, including of the missing article at The Newton Bee news source -- and better formatting to view. But I've put it here as well, for the record.) This is one of 2 posts with the same info below, because some people will click on this title and some on the "bombshell" title about the principal.

...........................................................


Sandy Hook massacre: Official story spins out of control

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/20/sandy-hook-massacre-official-story-spins-out-of-control/
Niall Bradley
Veteranstoday.com
Tue, 18 Dec 2012 17:21 CST


[Image. Caption: "Teddy bears left at a memorial for the child victims of the Sandy Hook massacre" ]


The massacre of 20 children and 7 adults at the Sandy Hook elementary school last Friday was one more in a long line of atrocious mass murders committed in the USA. By now, four days later, an official version of events has more or less solidified to explain the chain of events. The familiar 'lone gunman' narrative has once more stoked the hot-button issue of gun control and left the general population as clueless as ever as to why people suddenly 'go postal' and target the most vulnerable members of society.

On closer inspection, however, there is clearly more to many of these mass shootings than meets the eye. Very often the earliest reports present information that directly contradicts key foundations of the final 'official' analysis of events. Granted, confusion is natural when a story breaks, but some of the initial reports conflict so completely with the lone gunman narrative that I'm going to compile them here and then try to put this tragedy in a more objective context. In his speech at the Sandy Hook Interfaith Prayer Vigil in Newtown, Connecticut on Sunday night, President Obama quoted the following biblical passage:
"So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal."

~ 2 Corinthians 4:18
The traumatised Newtown community deserves the facts without the spin. Everyone touched by this brutal event deserves to know what really happened, so let's fix our eyes on what remains unseen...

A 20-year-old 'tech geek' named Adam Lanza is supposed to have snapped early last Friday, December 14th, shot dead his mother Nancy Lanza, loaded her car up with her guns and ammo, then driven it across town to his former school, the Sandy Hook Elementary School, shot dead 27 people in two classrooms and an adjoining hallway, then turned one of his guns on himself.

That's how most will now remember the shooting, but is that actually what happened?

All the child victims were first-graders between the ages of 6 and 7. If there's any saving grace to be found in this event, it's that it was all over within minutes. Police were reportedly on the scene "instantaneously" and by then the shooting had ended. Listed among the slain school teachers and administrative staff was the school principal, 47-year-old Dawn Hochsprung. Right here we encounter our first problem:

The Newtown Bee
December 14, 2012

Sandy Hook School Principal Dawn Hochsprung told The Bee that a masked man entered the school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots - more than she could count - that went "on and on."


[Image of now-missing article. Caption: © The Newtown Bee ]


How could the principal have survived to give this statement to local press describing what happened ... if she was one of the first to be killed? Incidentally, The Newtown Bee's article was taken down yesterday. Of course, a plausible explanation is that a reporter mistook another teacher for the principal.

We were initially told that two handguns - a Glock and a Sig Sauer - were found next to the body of the dead shooter, while a third weapon, a .223-caliber rifle was also recovered "in the trunk of a car" later, in the school's parking lot. All of the weapons were allegedly legally bought and registered in Nancy Lanza's name. The car was later identified as a black Honda, also registered in her name. More weapons have since been introduced to the story but we'll get back to those later on.

Besides anonymous 'law enforcement officials' telling the media that Adam Lanza was a former pupil at the school, they also said his mother was currently a teacher there, that she was found among the dead and that her son had specifically sought out her classroom first. But when it emerged that teaching staff at the school had never heard of a Nancy Lanza, it was suggested that she was a substitute teacher whose name therefore mightn't appear on staff lists.

But this claim too has disappeared down the memory hole because it's now known that neither Nancy nor her son had any connection with the school whatsoever. Adam Lanza was in fact home-schooled. Nancy Lanza has since been painted as a "survivalist" who loved firearms, taught her sons how to shoot and was "stockpiling" because she was "worried about economic collapse."

Daily Mail, UK
December 16, 2012

Last night it also emerged Nancy was a member of the Doomsday Preppers movement, which believes people should prepare for end of the world.

Her former sister-in-law Marsha said she had turned her home 'into a fortress'. She added: 'Nancy had a survivalist philosophy which is why she was stockpiling guns. She had them for defense.

'She was stockpiling food. She grew up on a farm in New Hampshire. She was skilled with guns. We talked about preppers and preparing for the economy collapsing.'
It's not difficult to see that their efforts to insinuate that Nancy Lanza was somehow responsible for this massacre by being an irresponsible mother also serve to rile the large contingent of gun owners in the country, particularly the far right who see a conspiracy on the government's part to "take back our guns." More on that later, but for now I just want to note that all of the Lanza family members seemed to live more or less normal middle-class lives. Yes, the parents were divorced but it was apparently amicable and both put their own needs second to those of their children (and anyway, divorce in the US these days is decidedly 'normal middle class').

Despite "family insiders" claiming that he was a "deeply disturbed kid", Adam Lanza, like so many other alleged 'lone(r) gunmen' before him, does not fit the profile of a mass-murdering maniac. His 24-year-old brother, Ryan Lanza, said he hadn't seen his brother since 2010. This fact brings into question Ryan's claim that his younger brother may have had his identity card on his person at the school shooting. Although perhaps the question that needs to be asked here is, why would a person bother to carry identification with them after going to the trouble of dressing up in a bullet-proof vest, mask and black camouflage gear and going on a killing spree ...

The live emergency services audio feed from the scene reveals some interesting observations from first responders that have been completely overlooked by the mainstream media. Note that the unedited version lasts over two hours, so the abridged version I'm going to quote from has a compressed sequence of events that are not in real time. In this abridged version, we hear at 1.38' a report that gunfire is still being heard, even though the shooting was supposed to have ended by the time police arrived. The next report at 2.35' says that the shooting has stopped and the school is "in lockdown". At 3.23', the police relay a teacher's report that she saw "two shadows running past the gym" [not "two shooters", as we previously reported on SOTT.net]. This is followed by another officer on the scene who says, "Yeh, we got 'em, they're coming at me! ... [inaudible] ... Coming up the driveway real slowly!" That same officer at 5.40' says he has them "proned out", which presumably means he has apprehended them and they are laid out on the ground, before another officer comes on to say, "be aware that we do have a second [inaudible] ..."

Later on, at 19.10', an officer who sounds out of breath, like he's just given chase, reports what I think sounds like "these guys" followed certainly by "multiple weapons, including long rifles and shotgun". If these were found so early on, why were they not included in the initial press reports which stated that three firearms had been found - the above mentioned Glock, Sig Sauer and Bushmaster AR-15 rifle? Further conflicting, and possibly planted evidence was thrown into the mix by 'law enforcement officials' when they published video footage of a long weapon being retrieved from the trunk of a car. Look closely and you'll see that it's a shotgun, not a rifle. In addition, this 'discovery' was made late in the day (it's dark outside), while the Bushmaster rifle was first reported found in the trunk of a car much earlier in the day.

Besides the above two suspects "proned out" in front of the school, another suspected gunman was apprehended after he gave chase, this time in the woods next to the school:


[Video "4th Shooter Discovered? Two Not One in Woods Behind Sandy Hook Elementary School"
 40-41 seconds. Mid-grey figure shows between trees. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=An1yHCzdNhQ
Uploaded by greenback001 ]



The police are clearly chasing someone whom they appear to apprehend in the middle of the woods next to the school, a fact confirmed by several eyewitnesses:


[Video "Police Walked A Man In Camo Pants And Dark Jacket Out Of Woods: Newton Connecticut School Shooting" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovspEgeMXb4 Uploaded by HistoricalRecordsVLT ]


This fleeing suspect, wearing camouflage gear, a bulletproof vest and armed with four guns, has since disappeared from media coverage. Who was this person and how did he know what "it" was when he protested that "I didn't do it"?

Perhaps most astonishingly, this suspect arrested in the woods was named in an Associated Press report as 24-year-old Ryan Lanza. The original report has long since vanished of course, but you can see it referenced here. This was despite the fact that Ryan had already been named as the deceased suspect inside the school, lying next to two handguns.

Ryan Lanza was actually at work in Hoboken, New Jersey, that morning when his name and photo began circulating in the media. And so, for most of Friday, the 'lone shooter' was erroneously reported as "Ryan Lanza, confirmed dead." At the same time, we were being told that Ryan's girlfriend and a room-mate were reported missing, also from Hoboken, New Jersey.

So this isn't just a case of mistaken identity, as later claimed when it was suggested that Adam had a piece of identification belonging to his brother on his person. Not one, but BOTH Lanza brothers were being placed by 'law enforcement officials' at the scene of the shooting. It could be that Ryan's quick reflexes to leave his workplace to get on a bus to go back to his apartment while protesting innocence via his Facebook page may have saved his life.

Now remember, all of this confusion somehow resulted from a single guy going into a school and shooting children and teachers and then shooting himself, all within three minutes. Surely it should have been fairly easy to rapidly and concretely identify the details of such a crime and the scene.

What it's starting to look like is that the Lanzas were framed for this mass shooting in advance. Long before any suspects were named, and even as we were being told that Nancy Lanza was among the dead at the school, we were told that police were investigating a murder in ... Hoboken, New Jersey, where a body had been found at the home of ... Ryan Lanza! An older "confirmed" version of events had RYAN, not Adam, travelling to Hoboken that morning to murder his father before going to the school in Newtown, Connecticut. Other variants had Ryan OR Adam going to both their divorced parents' homes and killing them before going to the school.

The narrative has now settled on the younger brother killing his mother in Newtown then going to the school. So what about the rest of it? Do we just put it down to 'keen' journalism that was having a field day last Friday as media outlets sought to bring us the latest 'breaking news'? Confusion and 'Chinese whispers' undoubtedly play a part in the early stages of national media events, but I think back to those news anchors reading scripts about Osama Bin Laden within minutes of the first plane being hit on 9/11 and I think, 'Wait a minute!' All these misleading reports had to have been issued by someone or some people "confirming" to Associated Press and other media outlets that the Ryans's father had been murdered [he wasn't even aware that the shooting at the school had taken place until journalists turned up on his doorstep], or that Ryan's girlfriend had gone missing from Hoboken, or that either Ryan or Adam were pulled out of the adjacent woods in handcuffs yelling "I DIDN'T DO IT" to assembled parents. These aren't just 'little details' that can be confused for other details, these are detailed narratives. So how, or why, would any member of the press come up with such details? They strike me as a set of alternative scenarios that might have found their way into the official narrative had facts on the ground turned out differently.

Watch this snippet of State Police Lt. Paul Vance at the press conference he gave the day after the shootings. His answer is as bizarre as it is revealing. When asked whether Nancy Lanza had any connection with the school, he replied defensively about something that is both unrelated and arguably the most significant fact that completely undermines the official narrative: the arrest of a second gunman in the woods:



[Video "Bizarre Glitch During Q&A At The 8am Press Conference (12/15) :Newtown Connecticut School Shooting" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qid9sE51d1k Uploaded by HistoricalRecordsVLT.

Comments of uploader say:

Published on Dec 15, 2012

I noticed this in the ABCNews.com version of the 8am press conference of 12/15. The reporter asks if the mother has any connection to the school, and seems to give a pre planned answer about the guy they found in the woods fitting the description of the shooter that was arrested and detained. He is indirectly claiming that he was cutting wood out there and that's why he was there. Did he live around there? Was he on his own property when they apprehended the suspected accomplice?

The glitch occurs around 10:52 into the ABC News version of the 8am press conference.
Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting: Shooter Forced Way Into School
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxz18i015tE ]



Most of the initial mainstream media reports have since been rewritten to fit 'new' facts proclaimed by 'law enforcement officials'. Here's an example from Business Insider. The following excerpts are the opening paragraphs from the 'same' article, one earlier original version, followed by the later revised version:
The massacre [...] was reportedly perpetrated with a .233 caliber rifle, a Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol.

The Bushmaster rifle was found in the trunk of the shooter's car. The Sig Sauer and Glock pistols were the only weapons used in the shooting, according to CBS. Now the question is what kind of magazine would allow a shooter to fire "100" rounds in such a short period.
Indeed, I was wondering the same thing. How could two pistols do so much damage? The report was updated as follows:
The massacre in Connecticut that's taken the lives of at least 26 people was reportedly perpetrated with a .223 caliber rifle, a Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol, according to NBC:

The shooter was using one Sig Sauer and one Glock pistol, according to CNN. Later details emerged that the primary weapon was the Bushmaster "assault-style" rifle.

Altogether, though, it doesn't matter what type of weapon the shooter used. The bottom line is that it was likely a magazine fed, semi-automatic, with enough rounds to shoot "100 shots" in a matter of minutes, as quoted in USA Today.
What actually happened may not matter to some, but surely a journalist's role is to at least try to find out?

This Associated Press/Newsday article on Saturday, December 15th, reported that "Only the rifle was used on the victims", a statement that is supported by Dr. H. Wayne Carver II, Connecticut state's chief medical examiner. Of the seven autopsies he personally performed on Sandy Hook victims, all of them had "three to 11 wounds apiece". He also said that the 'gunman' used a military-style rifle rigged to quickly reload, and that the 'shooter' was able to reload so quickly because he had "taped two magazines together." Even before the State Chief Medical Examiner had given these statements, it had been stated that spent shell casings from .233-caliber (rifle) bullets were found inside the school.

So all the victims' wounds were the result of rifle-fire, specifically from "the rifle", the one we were told in early reports was found in the trunk of a car in the parking lot! This is simply not credible.


[Image. Caption: © New York Daily News "The three guns Adam Lanza is supposed to have brought to the school with him. The rifle was left in the trunk, leaving him just the two handguns to let off 'hundreds of rounds'... firing .233 caliber bullets that belonged to the rifle... which was left in the car ]


Remember that only "the rifle" was used on all the victims. If only this rifle was used, and if we try to make this claim fit into the (admittedly fluid) official version of events, then the alleged lone gunman would have had to leave the school, place the rifle back in his trunk, then return inside the school and shoot himself. No one reported any such maneuver on the part of any gunman or gunmen. What we do have, however, is live emergency services radio feed in which we hear that two men have been apprehended and are "proned out" AND live video footage supported by eyewitness testimony showing what appears to be a THIRD man being arrested by police in the woods.

We can see how the authorities' hands are tied because they need to fit all the facts into the usual 'lone gunman' narrative. For that, there can only be ONE rifle and a couple of handguns. The problem is that they have already claimed to find that solitary Bushmaster rifle in the trunk of a car in the school parking lot, so the earliest police reports of a cache of long arms being found inside the school will no longer fit with the lone gunman narrative, especially as they're now saying that he had already opened fire as he burst into the school.

Could "scrawny" 20-year-old Adam Lanza have stormed the school, solo Rambo-style, while carrying "multiple long arms, including rifles and shotguns"? Only one person was wounded. Everyone else who was shot was killed. How could Adam Lanza achieve such deadly accuracy, in such a short length of recorded time?


[Image. Caption: "Similarly heavily armed men wearing black combat gear from head to toe... their job is to kill 'terrorists' to keep us safe, which they do by terrorising us all" ]


Initial reports put the beginning of the shooting in the school administrators' office, where someone, reportedly the school principal, had a row with the gunman(men). We know this because someone supposedly turned on the school intercom system, alerting the teaching staff to the loud swearing and commotion in the principal's office and probably saving many more children from being gunned down as teachers took measures to hide the children in closets.

One brave teacher, Kaitlin Roig, bundled a bunch of children into a bathroom and locked the door. What's interesting about her testimony to ABC News is that when police arrived and asked her to open the door, she refused, saying that "if they were really cops, they'd know where to find keys to open the door." In addition, she requested that they slide their badges under the door.

Now, this is generally a smart thing to do in any and all interactions with the police, especially in the U.S. But to have the wherewithal to do so under such traumatic circumstances strongly suggests that Ms. Roig had logically deduced by that point that multiple perpetrators were involved, and that they were either impersonating police officers or were indistinguishable from SWAT team police commandos, either in the way they dressed or the way they behaved upon entering the building. It also reminds us just how narrow the time window of the actual shooting was. The shooting appears to have barely ended when men knocked on that bathroom door and told Ms. Roig they were police.

There are also conflicting reports about how the gunmen entered the building. We were told initially that they came in through the main front entrance and proceeded straight to the administrators'/principal's offices. But Sandy Hook elementary school has a security system with a video monitor, which allows staff to screen visitors before buzzing them in. A "masked gunman dressed in black tactical combat gear" from head to toe would kinda raise red flags, don't you think?

Another possible anomaly is that Victoria Soto, one of the teachers killed at the school, appears to have had an 'in memoriam' Facebook page created in her name four days before the shooting.

Regarding this alleged 'LIBOR scandal' connection between this shooting and the Aurora theater shooting, there is as yet zero evidence to support the claim that either father of Lanza or Holmes were going to testify to anyone about anything, so for now this must remain just another rumor. I rather think that this is being spread to create the impression of a direct link that can be easily refuted, as in a straw man argument. The obvious and direct link staring everyone in the face is that the U.S. government's accounts of these events are hocus-pocus. The glaring connection between these two shootings, the Sikh Temple shooting and the Fort Hood shooting is that multiple gunmen were reported at the time by eyewitnesses, but they are now all officially claimed to have been carried out by 'lone gunmen'. This logically tells us that the real perpetrators are being protected with cover stories of what really happened because if the truth were known, some section of the U.S. government would be implicated.

Wade Michael Page, the 'lone gunman' in the Sikh Temple shooting in Wisconsin in August this year, was a highly decorated U.S. army psychological operations specialist, according to the Pentagon. But what happened to the three other gunmen seen by witnesses? It can't surely be coincidence that Wade was (former?) military psy-ops. The thought has crossed my mind more than once during the aftermath of the Connecticut shooting. Others too have suggested this was a 'false-flag' event, or that Lanza was some sort of Manchurian Candidate.

But maybe there's a simpler explanation (albeit more outrageous) than that? Was that really Adam Lanza they found inside the school? Do we even know for a fact that one of the gunmen was found dead inside the school? What we have instead are reports of two or three masked gunmen, apparently all dressed similarly in black tactical gear from head to toe, being wilfully forgotten about at best, or protected by the state at worst. Based on the authorities' persistent but futile efforts to connect the Lanzas to this school, the multiple eyewitness reports of two shooters, the Connecticut State Medical Examiner's report that all the victims were riddled with bullets from a rifle that we're simultaneously being asked to believe was in the trunk of a car the whole time, similar reports of multiple shooters in previous mass shootings in recent years and the media focusing the emotional outcry onto the hot-button topic of gun control ... I'm left wondering if this was actually the work of some highly trained professional hit team?

Was the massacre at Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, a psy-op, using what amounts to a 'death squad' and a carefully planned mission to terrorise people on behalf of the government, in combination with perception management to shape the narrative and vector the emotional fallout?

Gun control isn't the issue here. The US government would long since have taken measures, quietly, to limit the supply of weapons, the 2nd Amendment of the constitution be damned (it's "just a goddamned piece of paper", remember?), if it was really concerned with limiting civilian access to weapons.

The psychopaths in power have absolutely no compunction about using state terrorism, in this case organising the deliberate massacre of innocent children, to control people. In effect, this is little different from the U.S. government calls counter-insurgency or counter-terrorism in foreign countries, where it attacks innocent civilians to create the impression that they were killed by 'communists', 'terrorists', 'insurgents' or 'militants', with the aim of generating public support for the illusion that the common people need a strong, ruthless government to protect them from the 'evil-doers'. When the common people buy into this manipulation, the end result, as history shows repeatedly, is an overt and brutal police state.

[Image. Caption: "Niall Bradley" ]

Niall Bradley has been an editor at Sott.net since 2009. He is also an editor of Sott.net's print publication, the Dot Connector Magazine and has appeared as a guest commentator on Press TV. Niall has written numerous articles for Sott.net, where he focuses on analysing geo-political trends in the context of so-called climate change.


Wednesday, 19 December 2012

4 School Shootings stopped: citzns w/guns

(Please also read post of Dec. 9, 2012)




4 School Shootings stopped by citizens w/guns
I don't like guns myself, as a general thing, but, hey, that doesn't make me unreasonable about gun access:


J. D. Heyes
Natural News
December 19, 2012
http://www.naturalnews.com/038404_massacres_gun_owners_defense.html


In the midst of all the anti-gun hysteria following the senseless murder of 26 people – 20 of them first graders – at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., one story that is repeatedly overlooked is how often a firearm has been used to save lives and stop senseless murders.

We here at Natural News believe the mainstream media, which so often overlooks these kinds of stories because they don’t fit into the statist government worldview held by the majority of news editors, has done a disservice to the public by ignoring these acts of selflessness and heroism.

With that in mind, we bring just some of the most recent high-profile incidents – including what could have been additional school massacres – that were stopped by law-abiding citizens using their Second Amendment rights to protect themselves and others. Scores of individual uses that never get reported are not included here:

Pearl High School, Mississippi: This incident began the morning of Oct. 1, 1997, when 16-year-old student Luke Windham entered the school with a rifle. Wearing only an orange jumpsuit and a trench coat and making no effort to hide his weapon, he initially entered the school and shot and killed two students, injuring seven others. He was stopped by assistant principal Joel Myrick, who retrieved a .45 cal. handgun from the glove box of his truck.

“I’ve always kept a gun in the truck just in case something like this ever happened,” said Myrick at the time, who went on to become principal of Corinth High School, Corinth, Miss.

Appalachia Law School, Virginia: On Jan. 16, 2002, Peter Odighizuwa, 43, a former student from Nigeria, arrived on the campus of the school with a handgun around 1:00 p.m. and immediately killed three people, at least two of them at point-blank range. Two students – Mikael Gross and Tracy Bridges – both retrieved handguns from their vehicles and confronted Odighizuwa. As former police officers, both men were trained to subdue suspects but the fact is they were on the scene and armed, and helped prevent more killings.

Muskegon, Michigan: From the Aug. 23, 1995, issue of the Muskegon Chronicle: “Plans to slay everyone in the Muskegon, Michigan, store and steal enough cash and jewelry to feed their ‘gnawing hunger for crack cocaine’ fell apart for a band of would-be killers after one of their victims fought back. Store owner Clare Cooper was returning behind the counter after showing three of the four conspirators some jewelry, when one of the group pulled out a gun and shot him four times in the back. Stumbling for the safety of his bullet-proof glass-encased counter, Cooper managed to grab his shotgun and fire as the suspects fled.“

Colorado Springs, Colo.: On Dec. 9, 2007, gunman Mathew Murray, 24, launched an armed attack against the parishioners of the New Life Church that ultimately left two innocent victims dead. But the toll could have been much higher, were it not for the heroic actions of former police officer Jeanne Assam from Minnesota. In an interview she said she very nearly decided not to go to church that morning but because she saw a headline on her computer indicating that two young people were murdered and a training center for Christian missionaries about 70 miles away in the Denver suburb of Arvada, she changed her mind. Murray shot a total of five people before an armed Assam shot and killed him. There were about 7,000 people at the church at the time of the attack.

“Criminologist Gary Kleck estimates that 2.5 million Americans use guns to defend themselves each year. Out of that number, 400,000 believe that but for their firearms, they would have been dead,” columnist Larry Elder wrote in July, following the shooting tragedy at the premier of the latest Batman movie in Aurora, Colo.

“We know from Census Bureau surveys that something beyond 100,000 uses of guns for self-defense occur every year,” adds Professor Emeritus James Q. Wilson, a public policy expert at the University of California-Los Angeles. “We know from smaller surveys of a commercial nature that the number may be as high as two-and-a-half or three million. We don’t know what the right number is, but whatever the right number is, it’s not a trivial number.”

[Natural News used these] Sources:

http://www.nraila.org

http://gunwatch.blogspot.com

http://blutube.policeone.com

http://www.thedenverchannel.com

http://www.ocregister.com/articles/gun-366250-guns-ice.html

Police Radio/TV Heli: 2-4 shooters, Sandy Hook (Newtown)

(Please also read post of Dec. 9, 2012)


**UPDATE (Jan. 8, 2012):

Police went door to door (looking for someone, presumably), and rushed into a school 1 mile away (were standing -- guarding? tip and threat? -- in parking lot of St Rose of Lima school, and rushed in, suddenly; false alarm? real shooter in there?). See post of Jan. 8 about this.

Obviously, they didn't assume one shooter right away.

........................................................


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETkrxfYoQtc
Uploaded by Radioman911TV

Unedited tapes.

"Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting - Newtown Police / Fire and CT State Police Radio Traffic"

Reports of 2nd gunman and more.


...........

Faraway view from police helicopter shows figure as ripple effect -- closeup cut off in playback before movement shows in closeup. Figure is up in woods hours before the curious got there. Dives behind a bush. Police are running after another direction or suspect.

"4th Shooter Discovered? Two Not One in Woods Behind Sandy Hook Elementary School"
40-41 seconds. Mid-grey figure shows between trees.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=An1yHCzdNhQ
Uploaded by greenback001

Tuesday, 18 December 2012

Satanism & Pedophilia at Columbine & wider area

(Please also read post of Dec. 9, 2012)


Satanism and Pedophilia Rings serving Intelligence or Para-Intelligence rings were connected to the events at Columbine somehow.


[But before we get into that, please read the following notice about the general state of the information available now, and go to the "German in orange & NATO at Columbine" page on this Blogsite. It also begins with the following but has other information you will want, about evidence that there was a "drill" that day, other forensic considerations of who was where and what they saw and what was said. And there is a final third page about Satanism/ Pedophilia rings connected to the group which seems to have done this, on this blogsite.

An original movie on the subject of Columbine was already taken down in 2012, but another movie which explained quite a bit was still up and showed some FOIA materials has also been taken down now, since 2012. The article on my page about German Nazism and NATO connections to the event has many photos of documents, huge amounts of arms, some of the documents showing multiple intruders, or at least that was in the now-missing movie for which the transcript is below. The article on the German and NATO material also discusses evidence there was a drill that day. Another article on this blogsite is about how there was a 9/11-style hijacking planned for that day at Columbine.

Here is the link to the now-defunct movie site as a matter of reference, too.

 (Note Made on October 6, 2015)


...........

For FOIA/ police court-ordered released documents on what witnesses saw at Columbine, see:
For movie:
http://evanlong.net/columbine/the-columbine-cause/
All FOIA relevant documents shown.

For transcript:
http://evanlong.net/columbine/the-columbine-cause/official-transcript-of-the-columbine-cause/


Summary of some of it follows:

Neo-Nazi influence at parties (see post on Satanism and Pedophilia at Columbine on this blog)

might relate to German seen with gun, giving orders, in orange shirt ... and more, below:

Lisa Forgan heard an attacker speaking German and wearing an orange shirt

Multiple witnesses (from disclosed documents, and shown in this video) identified:

Very tall, heavy acne, bad teeth, overbyte, cape and cap and black sneakers
And specifically said they knew him or picked him out of a lineup photo group
And most knew the guy by name, but the name is redacted on the documents

Again, Lisa Forgan heard an attacker speaking German and wearing an orange shirt

-- Also a man short, going bald, short spiky hair, 30s

-- One who had long black hair, blond streaks

-- And more.


[UNFORTUNATELY, THIS MOVIE IS REMOVED, SINCE 2012. THE KEY ITEMS WERE MANY TESTAMENTS, SHOWN AND DISCUSSED, WHERE TESTIFIERS (WITNESSES) SPECIFICALLY KNEW OTHER PEOPLE SHOOTING AND / OR COULD IDENTIFY MANY OF THE SAME FEATURES OF PERSON OR DRESS THAT THOSE WHO KNEW SOME OF THE SHOOTERS SAID. -- As to having many witnesses lying now, or being quiet, remember: they may a) feel they were mistaken since it was not pursued, b) be moving on with their lives, upset it was not pursued, c) gotten the message directly or indirectly from its not being pursued, that this was a seriously larger event and maybe dangerous for the country for them to reveal it, so they would be disloyal, or d) all of the same as in point "c" but with the added feeling that they are in danger if they speak out.

-- This note was made Oct 6, 2015]


And the parents of the accused 2 "lone shooters" gave depositions, which are blocked from public disclosure until ... 2027.

---------------------------


Satanism & Pedophilia at Columbine & Wider Area:


Here is a partial transcript for the movie linked above but now removed. It also included information from the FOIA documents about specific witnesses and/ or specific witness claims (if witness was not identified in redacted -- blacked-out -- parts of documents):


Partial Transcript (defunct link for transcript at bottom):

While he was talking to government investigators, CHS class of ’98 and TCM member Eric Ault confirmed that the TCM “talked about setting bombs around the school and blowing up the school” and “[t]hat they talked about how it would be fun as a senior prank to ride through the school on dirt bikes with guns and shoot it up.”

Ault also told them that “the group was into Satanic worship,” and that, when the groups got into a fight, “the mafia group would chant satanic verses as they walked by the jocks”.

Whatever Robert McDuffy’s impetus for dropping the potato on the CHS TCM in his report, an unnamed individual in the reports called up accounts of a Denver-area culture well outside the bounds of humanity.

This individual, who attended another high school in the area, related that he had been to parties attended by goths and trench coat mafia individuals in their 20′s across the area, and that most of the trench coat mafia individuals were out of school and that there were not very many who were still in school. He stated that they were into bloodletting, cutting and violence.

He also was questioned on sexually explicit photographs found in his backpack which were homosexual in nature, and stated that he had been to the house of an individual known to some in this circuit as “Pedophile Bill”, a homosexual man who was, quote, “not nice sexually” and had given him these pictures and also showed him photo albums which made him sick to his stomach. The albums, he said, contained sexually explicit photographs of small children up to the age of fourteen.

Joe Stair was said by shop classmate Andy Perlman to have carried a book with him which he referred to as “The Devil’s Bible” and to have mentioned that he worshiped the devil.

Stair, along with TCM member Eric Dutro, were playing a card game in the Columbine cafeteria one day when they got up from their table, “and began harassing other students by getting in their faces and saying, “Satan loves you”. Many students were upset by Dutro’s behavior. Stair and Dutro then began kissing each other in front of the entire cafeteria. In disgust, Paul Maten went to their table, and pushed all of their playing cards to the ground.” “Later that summer, Maten began receiving death threats on the telephone. He would answer the phone, and an individual would say [that] he was going to kill Maten.” “German music was playing in the background.” [Ed.: For more on the German connection, see my blog post "German wearing orange (and NATO?) at Columbine", Dec. 18, 2012, youcanknowsometimes.blogspot.ca]

TCM co-founder Tad Boles explained the trench coat phenomenon as that the group just starting wearing them “to stay warm”. Likewise, the term “trench coat mafia” was said to have innocently originated from an outsider who jokingly asked those wearing the coats, “Who do you think you are, the Trench Coat Mafia?” As a cultural phenomenon, however, psychotically violent individuals in trench coats was not something confined to Littleton, nor to Colorado, despite such claims to the contrary, a fact which makes the reports of TCM associates jumping all over each other in anxiety of being able to prove themselves the first to have worn the coat in Littleton all the more colossal a tragedy. In fact, it had appeared all over America in the mid 1990′s, the same time that it happened in Littleton, as almost anyone in their teens or twenties at that time could tell you.

This cultural meme, perhaps a grotesque mutation of the often gang-related, juvenile delinquent or “bad-boy” black leather jacket, was pushed in mainstream commercial venues on an international basis. Even then-Vice President Al Gore got into the act when he visited Jefferson County for the Columbine memorial ceremony.

Several of these examples, including “The Crow”, released in 1994, “Blade”, 1998, and “The Matrix”, which debuted just before the attack on CHS, had particularly mystical or occult-themed storylines. Boyd Rice, a founder of the Luciferian group, Ordo Lapsit Exillis, and a “Magister” in the Church of Satan’s “Council of Nine”, declared that such films are, indeed, evidence of the resurrection of an occult tradition he refers to as the “Arcadian Mystique”. Chris Morris, who was alleged to have reported to a classmate at CHS that he didn’t follow God’s commandments, but Satan’s commandments, and that we were all characters in a video game being controlled by someone else, might have been of the same opinion.

The quote-unquote “industrial” music culture, of which Rice was a part, and which gained significant commercial ground in the 1990′s, surrounded, was interwoven with and reinforced the occult themes of these movies, and with the more mainstream end of which the Trench Coat Mafia were well-acquainted. This “industrial culture” movement, and particularly its “industrial music” component, is said to have been consciously spawned by British performance artist and self-styled “social engineer”, Neil Megson.

Megson, who has employed a variety of pseudonyms, has given interviews alongside and as a friend of now-deceased Church of Satan founder Anton Lavey. Like Lavey, Megson also founded an occult organization of his own known as the Temple of Psychick Youth.

Called TOPY, the temple is an offshoot of a deconstructionist occult movement known as chaos magic, a movement created in the 1970′s which has noticeably given rise to the order of the Illuminates of Thanateros, which takes its name from those of the gods Thanatos, Greek for “death”, and Eros, a sexual god, sex and death being primary drives of the human psyche.

The [group] Illuminates of Thanateros, or IOT, initiates’ manual, titled Liber Null, declares that its organization is one along a millennia-old lineage dating back to the earliest shamans and is dedicated to twisting the unconscious desires of humanity through lies, trickery, and magic, or advanced, and often subtly exercised, psycho-physiological manipulation.

The aim of this process has been to lead humanity away from our natural, timeless origins along a progression through several ages of an increasingly complex system of money, religion, and professional politics, the proposed end of which is a perpetual “age of chaos,” an aim bearing remarkable similarities to the dialectical materialism propounded by Marx [Ed.: a development from Hegel and picked up by Alistair Crowley and Manson].

The “age of chaos” is to be a permanent dark age [according to these groups, sounding Process Church and Mansonite] characterized by the death of what is decent and natural within humanity, and in which occultism and magic are to reign supreme as the dominant mode of interpreting reality.

IOT members, and chaos magicians in general, typically include members of other occult organizations including the Church of Satan and the Temple of Set, the latter of which is a black magical, or “left hand path”, organization based on Egyptian Set worship, Set being the mythological “bringer of night” opposing the god, Osiris, and a Satan figure in pre-Christian days. This organization was founded by quote-unquote “High Setian Priest” Michael Aquino, a U. S. Army Lt. Colonel and co-author of a 1975 psychological warfare manual titled “From Psyop to MindWar: the Psychology of Victory”, which displays an egregiously warped view of the nature of truth.

Aquino and his wife, who went by the name of “Lilith,” were accused in 1987 of sexually abusing three year old boys and girls in day care programs at the U. S. Army’s Presidio, a practice perhaps not that uncommon, if articles like Dave McGowan’s “The Pedophocracy” are accurate.

Several TCM members and affiliates also recall the use of the term “FNORD” in computer screen names and classroom writings. “FNORD” is a reference of the writings of now-deceased Golden Dawn initiate Robert Anton Wilson, who wrote of an psychological war between occult factions attempting to control the minds of humanity in his trilogy, Illuminatus!. Wilson was a close associate of Peter Carroll, the wealthy real estate investor who co-founded the IOT and who has written many of the works fundamental to chaos magic. Carroll still teaches courses at Wilson’s on-line Maybe Logic Academy.

Transcript above is at:
http://evanlong.net/columbine/the-columbine-cause/official-transcript-of-the-columbine-cause/

Denver Post: Columbine had 9/11-style hijack to NYC

(Please also read post of Dec. 9, 2012)


Like 9/11 within 2 calendar years, the plan was larger was to hijack a plane and crash it into NYC buildings.



[But before we get into that, please read the following notice about the general state of the information available now, and go to the "German in orange & NATO at Columbine" page on this Blogsite. It also begins with the following but has other information you will want, about evidence that there was a "drill" that day, other forensic considerations of who was where and what they saw and what was said. And there is a final third page about Satanism/ Pedophilia rings connected to the group which seems to have done this, on this blogsite.

An original movie on the subject of Columbine was already taken down in 2012, but another movie which explained quite a bit was still up and showed some FOIA materials has also been taken down now, since 2012. The article on my page about German Nazism and NATO connections to the event has many photos of documents, huge amounts of arms, some of the documents showing multiple intruders, if I remember -- but perhaps that was in the other movie.

Here is the link to the now-defunct movie site as a matter of reference, too.

 (Note Made on October 6, 2015)


...........

For FOIA/ police court-ordered released documents on what witnesses saw at Columbine, see:
For movie:
http://evanlong.net/columbine/the-columbine-cause/
All FOIA relevant documents shown.

For transcript:
http://evanlong.net/columbine/the-columbine-cause/official-transcript-of-the-columbine-cause/


Summary of some of it follows:

Neo-Nazi influence at parties (see post on Satanism and Pedophilia at Columbine on this blog)

might relate to German seen with gun, giving orders, in orange shirt ... and more, below:

Lisa Forgan heard an attacker speaking German and wearing an orange shirt

Multiple witnesses (from disclosed documents, and shown in this video) identified:

Very tall, heavy acne, bad teeth, overbyte, cape and cap and black sneakers
And specifically said they knew him or picked him out of a lineup photo group
And most knew the guy by name, but the name is redacted on the documents

Again, Lisa Forgan heard an attacker speaking German and wearing an orange shirt

-- Also a man short, going bald, short spiky hair, 30s

-- One who had long black hair, blond streaks

-- And more.


[UNFORTUNATELY, THIS MOVIE IS REMOVED, SINCE 2012. THE KEY ITEMS WERE MANY TESTAMENTS, SHOWN AND DISCUSSED, WHERE TESTIFIERS (WITNESSES) SPECIFICALLY KNEW OTHER PEOPLE SHOOTING AND / OR COULD IDENTIFY MANY OF THE SAME FEATURES OF PERSON OR DRESS THAT THOSE WHO KNEW SOME OF THE SHOOTERS SAID. -- As to having many witnesses lying now, or being quiet, remember: they may a) feel they were mistaken since it was not pursued, b) be moving on with their lives, upset it was not pursued, c) gotten the message directly or indirectly from its not being pursued, that this was a seriously larger event and maybe dangerous for the country for them to reveal it, so they would be disloyal, or d) all of the same as in point "c" but with the added feeling that they are in danger if they speak out.

-- This note was made Oct 6, 2015]


And the parents of the accused 2 "lone shooters" gave depositions, which are blocked from public disclosure until ... 2027.


..................


9/11 Style Preparations and Hijacking and bombs were part of the Columbine plot:

1.


MIT newspaper "Tech Online" (a reprint of LA Times article, referencing Denver Post, April 29, 1999):


Volume 119 >> Issue 22 : Tuesday, April 27, 1999
Columbine Killers Envisioned Hijacking and Crashing Plane

Jefferson County Sheriff John Stone earlier told reporters the goal of the killers, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, was to strike during the busy lunch hour to go for “a big kill.”

But in an interview published today in The Denver Post, Stone said the gunmen’s diary indicates that if they survived, they wanted more-- to “hijack an airplane and crash it into a major city.” He said New York City was their target.

“Once they burned the school down, then they were just going to start ravaging the neighborhood, killing as many people as they could,” Stone told the newspaper Sunday.

http://tech.mit.edu/V119/N22/littleton.22w.html



Summary of the situation:

And Martin Middleton, who had been in the Jefferson County area in the mid-90′s, at that time encountered an individual talking about the attempted bombing that would take place on Hitler’s 110th birthday who also told him that the Trench Coat Mafia which would be attempting it was not just a bunch of lonely depressed kids, but something much larger.

Indeed, we were told after the attack that the Columbine attackers had planned to not just shoot and maim a few dozen students, but to kill 500 people, level the school with bombs, hijack a plane from Denver’s New World Airport and, despite their total inexperience with aviation, fly it over 2000 miles where they would perhaps lodge it into skyscrapers in New York City, a plan which may have sounded foreign to audiences of 1999 but which today seems all too familiar.

http://evanlong.net/columbine/the-columbine-cause/official-transcript-of-the-columbine-cause/

(Movie of which the previous link is the transcript, and which shows the FOIA documents for the case: http://evanlong.net/columbine/the-columbine-cause/ )



[Clare's comments:]

Perhaps Columbine was a larger operation: a neo-NAZI (April 20, Hitler's birthday) subgroup organized terror attack, para-government related. Why? To see what could be done? To push for gun control? To create a larger fear and prepare for 9/11 style?
Thus it would be protected.
Harris also complained he was being drugged on the military base of his father. This suggests mind-control programs -- if you know of those.
This also has shades of Manson's operation, which was likely a near-military or paramilitary hit, linked to many persons in Laurel Canyon, and of which many aspects were suppressed as much as possible.


.............................

2.


FBI agent downplays son's film

An FBI agent investigating the Columbine High School shooting whose son helped produce a video parody in which the school is destroyed says the film is a comedy and not a depiction of gratuitous violence.

Dwayne Fuselier also said the participation of his son, Scott, in the video, which was made more than two years before the April 20 massacre, does not compromise his ability to investigate the case.

MORE:

http://extras.denverpost.com/news/shot0513b.htm

[Clare's comments - Dec 2012:]

In the context of the much wider operation (see other posts on Columbine in this blog), to promote or control groups of Goth and Trenchcoat Mafia, spinning them toward Satanic and neo-Nazi activities, throughout the greater Denver area, and involving at least one violent pedophile on record, though possibly a ring of violent pedophiles ... we may wonder if the FBI investigator's son was part of such controlled groups; if so, the FBI investigator would either, then, also know and be a cover-up artist willfully, or would not have known but be compromised and thus be a cover-up artist unwillingly but knowingly.

Monday, 17 December 2012

A German in Orange (and NATO?) at Columbine


(Please also read post of Dec. 9, 2012)
I am copying the first article and images verbatim because the movie and transcript I originally link to below (at the bottom) are now missing: censored or the person took down their Website. A lot of information on Columbine is now harder to find (in my experience). So I am copying the following page fully. I hope the creator realizes I intend no plagiarism and copy in the best interest of their work and the issues. There are three posts on Columbine in my blog, all from Dec. 2012. Please have a look. --

One thing that I have also done is make the huge set of images from the end of the article larger, whereas at the original site they are expandable but not large.


There is a *huge* section at the bottom, with the initial police releases of documents or possibly some FOIA materials (but not the thousands of pages) and photos of the other suspects and FBI and military present so quickly on the scene, plus many other things. It has been some time since I did my own reading on this issue, so I know the original movie was already taken down in 2012, but the other movie which explained quite a bit was still up and showed some FOIA materials has also been taken down now, since 2012. This article below has many photos of documents, huge amounts of arms, some of the documents showing multiple intruders, if I remember -- but perhaps that was in the other movie.

Before we go to the article, though, the first section is mine. I am leaving the link to the now-defunct movie site as a matter of reference, too.

 (Note Made on October 6, 2015)


...........

For FOIA/ police court-ordered released documents on what witnesses saw at Columbine, see:
For movie:
http://evanlong.net/columbine/the-columbine-cause/
All FOIA relevant documents shown.

For transcript:
http://evanlong.net/columbine/the-columbine-cause/official-transcript-of-the-columbine-cause/


Summary of some of it follows:

Neo-Nazi influence at parties (see post on Satanism and Pedophilia at Columbine on this blog)

might relate to German seen with gun, giving orders, in orange shirt ... and more, below:

Lisa Forgan heard an attacker speaking German and wearing an orange shirt

Multiple witnesses (from disclosed documents, and shown in this video) identified:

Very tall, heavy acne, bad teeth, overbyte, cape and cap and black sneakers
And specifically said they knew him or picked him out of a lineup photo group
And most knew the guy by name, but the name is redacted on the documents

Again, Lisa Forgan heard an attacker speaking German and wearing an orange shirt

-- Also a man short, going bald, short spiky hair, 30s

-- One who had long black hair, blond streaks

-- And more.


[UNFORTUNATELY, THIS MOVIE IS REMOVED, SINCE 2012. THE KEY ITEMS WERE MANY TESTAMENTS, SHOWN AND DISCUSSED, WHERE TESTIFIERS (WITNESSES) SPECIFICALLY KNEW OTHER PEOPLE SHOOTING AND / OR COULD IDENTIFY MANY OF THE SAME FEATURES OF PERSON OR DRESS THAT THOSE WHO KNEW SOME OF THE SHOOTERS SAID. -- As to having many witnesses lying now, or being quiet, remember: they may a) feel they were mistaken since it was not pursued, b) be moving on with their lives, upset it was not pursued, c) gotten the message directly or indirectly from its not being pursued, that this was a seriously larger event and maybe dangerous for the country for them to reveal it, so they would be disloyal, or d) all of the same as in point "c" but with the added feeling that they are in danger if they speak out.

-- This note was made Oct 6, 2015]


And the parents of the accused 2 "lone shooters" gave depositions, which are blocked from public disclosure until ... 2027.



Okay, now on to the section of the article and a huge amount of images at the end:




NATO at Columbine?


http://usahitman.com/columbine/

See bottom section re. NATO. Also note questions above that section (the main part of page is questions).



THE FOLLOWING IS THE ARTICLE LINKED ABOVE, PLUS ITS MANY FOIA IMAGES>









The Columbine Shooting Conspiracy


Unanswered Questions

1. Why did numerous ear-witnesses say at least one attacker was firing a fully-automatic weapon?
2. Why did police concentrate on setting up a perimeter at the same time dispatch(via phone) is hearing the sound of gunshots within the school?
3. Why did it take police so long to enter the school, and why did it take almost three hours for them to reach the library, the area where the shooters were last seen? Who gave the orders not to go in?
4. Why did over 100 eye- and ear- witnesses dispute the official theory of only two shooters? Why did over 40 of those witnesses identify other participants BY NAME?
5. If the two shooters committed suicide shortly after noon, as police claim, how come at least 35 witnesses saw or heard suspects/gunshots/explosions after that time?
6. Why are there conflicting eyewitness accounts on the place and manner in which at least four of the dead victims were killed? Were victims being moved around? Was the crime scene being rearranged?
7. If left-handed Klebold shot himself in the left temple, why was his suicide weapon found clutched in his right hand?
8. How did students manage to keep seriously wounded teacher Dave Sanders alive for more than three hours while awaiting rescue, yet he was dead within 20 minutes of the police taking control of him? His corpse was later found with his shirt off. Is that first-aid? Or a sure-fire way of sending someone into shock?
9. What was the motive? Why would two teens who were not bullied, did not hate everyone, and were not psychopathic suddenly decide to destroy the lives of a dozen fellow students and themselves just six weeks before graduation?
10. Why would Harris and Klebold plan for a suicide mission and at the same time make normal plans for a post 4-20 future? Like seeking help on an English class essay from a teacher a few days before the attack, like making a date to see a movie the day after, like putting in a work schedule for the next week, like going to an out-of-town college with your dad to pick out a dorm room, like making plans to visit your old friends in New York.
11. Where is the gun shot residue(GSR) test evidence for Harris and Klebold and the other suspects?
12. Why was fingerprint evidence for Harris and Klebold not found on all but two of the hundreds of obects gathered at the scene? Whose fingerprints, if any, were found on the weapons seized?
13. Why does the official story claim, without a shred of evidence, that it was Harris and Klebold that set the South Wadsworth diversionary bomb (an incendiary device that exploded a couple of miles away from the school minutes before the shooting started)?
14. Why did authorities claim the two shotguns seized had no serial numbers when later documents clearly show they did have serial numbers? Why did they not try to find out who sold Harris and Klebold the Hi-Point 9mm rifle and the pump-action shotgun that were used in the shooting?
15. Were the school administrators warned, as rumored? Who was Principle Frank DeAngelis looking for, as reported by one student who saw him running up and down the interior cafeteria stairs right before the shooting broke out?
16. Why did a science teacher tell his students that they had been expecting a fire drill? Was a bomb found in a trash can on 4-19, as one source indicated? Were bomb threats phoned into the school on the morning of 4-20, as two others claimed?
17. Why didn’t the Final Report conclude that shooters entered Science rooms 1 and 8, when numerous shell casings were taken from these areas?
18. Why didn’t the Final Report mention the brief exit of a shooter on the east side, according to many eyewitnesses?
19. If the person seen on the roof of the school was a repairman, as police claim, why do witnesses say he was holding a weapon? Were shell casings found there, as some said?
20. Who scheduled ‘crisis training’ drills at Columbine High Schol(CHS) in the weeks before and what was the exact nature of this training?
21. What was a Denver police officer and a Jefferson County sheriff doing at Columbine High Shcool that morning before the shooting started?
22. What does reputed video evidence from the library and admin office areas show? Why does local media refuse to release on-scene video footage from the first half-hour of the incident?
23. What happened to all the evidence taken from the computers of the trenchcoat mafia gang?
24. Where are dozens of missing interviews of students, especially those in the science hall? Why are there still thousands of pages of investgatory materials that have never been made public, including hundreds of reports of non-Columbine witnesses and tipsters?
25. Why has the school district’s own report on the shooting, which included the extensive disciplinary records of the trenchcoat mafia associates, not been made public?
26. Did investigators even try to interview Harris’ psychologist, the man perhaps best positioned to know his mental state at the time?
27. Why did investigators show a remarkable lack of curiousity about connections with numerous similar school violence-related incidents occuring around the same time in the metro-Denver area and around the country?
28. Why did LAPD and Los Angeles Sheriff’s Office personnel travel to the scene afterwards? What was the subject of a 10-minute phone call made by the NYPD to the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office on 4-20?
29. Who invited the FBI and the ATF to the scene?
30. Why was the US Attorney’s Office (federal) consulted on ‘prosecutive decisions’ for this local crime?
31. Why was all but one of the seven ‘investigatory’ teams headed or co-headed by an FBI man? (the one exception was a team headed by a CBI(Colorado Bureau of Investigation) man, who was himself ‘ex’-FBI) Was the entire crime scene ‘federalized’ soon after the shooting started, under powers granted by the ‘Anti-terrorism Act’ (”for the protection of the people and the state”) signed by President Clinton exactly three years before- on April 20, 1996?
32. Why did FBI special agent Dwayne Fusilier not recuse himself from the investigation, as his son helped make a Columbine school video two years before that eerily mimicked the shooting?
33. What were two high-ranking military figures (a colonel and a general) in cami uniforms doing at the scene? Why was a memorial service at a public park afterwards ringed by military trucks? Who authorized a flyover by military jets and why?

NATO AT COLUMBINE!

By John A. Quinn
1999
In what this reporter feels is some of the most bizarre, disturbing, inexplicable and chilling news yet about the Columbine High School shooting incident is news that a large NATO truck — possible more than one — and obviously at least some NATO troops, were reportedly present at Columbine High School within MINUTES AFTER THE SHOOTING BROKE OUT!
I ws notified by email by a TV viewer who DISTINCTLY recalls seeing the NATO vehicle while watching local TV station Fox-WFLD in Chicago shortly after the massacre began. The local station was picking up a live feed from a CNN chopper in the air above Columbine High School.
We have spoken with a station representative of WFLD and can at least verify that indeed they WERE broadcasting the feed as stated. WFLD however apparently has no video record of their own as they were rebroadcasting CNN’s (live) video.
This information is EXTREMELY SIGNIFICANT, powerful evidence of what an utter lie the entire American populace is living under regarding the true, fundamental status of our nation, who’s actually running it, and it’s very socio/political foundations. This is literally DEVASTATING news for any of us who still believe we live in some sort of “free,” sovereign democratic republic.
It has long been postulated, with some very good evidence to back it up, that the Denver area is one of the primary command, control and support hangouts for the NEW WORLD ORDER crew. Reams of evidence far to extensive to go over here give substantial weight to such statements.
This is what was reported regarding what our contact saw while watching the Columbine tragedy unfold on TV:
“I saw a NATO bomb squad from a live helicopter shot on TV…it made me wonder what they were doing there, who were the good guys and who were the bad?
OK, this is what I saw on FOX WFLD Chicago. They had a live feed coming from CNN and early on in the transmission they had a aerial view from a helicopter, at about 12:30 CST. In the parking lot right outside of the school there was what what looked like a blue moving van and in front of the truck there was a four foot blue curved shield (looking like a half of a barrel) with the letters of NATO clearly marked on this armor. Well the camera did a close up but after only a couple of seconds that feed was cut.
I am POSITIVE about what I saw on FOX WFLD Chicago within the first hour of coverage.”
ANYONE who recalls seeing this while watching the CNN live camera feed from a chopper PLEASE contact NewsHawk at once!
NewsHawk has also since received further verification and corroboration that NATO military personnel were present at Columbine from people who saw such personnel with NATO body shields on CNN almost IMMEDIATELY after the massacre began–meaning they may well have been there ALREADY!!
The following supportive testimony from (whitney@usa.com) is indicative of what we’ve received.
“To MY AMAZEMENT I saw a dark colored outfitted person with a personal protection shield walking around and on the top of this shield it said = N A T O in white!! I said what in the hell are they doing there, 15 minutes probably into the scene?? !!! I’m guessing about the time John because this was MINUTES INTO WHEN THEY STARTED TO COVER IT LIVE (CNN or FOX).”
(This correlates time-wise with information revealed by my contact in Chicago watching live CNN footage a NATO vehicle at Columbine.-JQ)
“I was going for NBC and flipped down both CNN and FOX: they’re two channels apart so hard telling.”
John Whitney
The presence of NATO personnel and equipment operating ANYWHERE on American soil is utterly and extraordinarily outrageous; and a complete, total violation in every possible way of what WE BELIEVE TO BE our national sovereignty.
Furthermore, aside from these terribly serious implications just noted, the presence of NATO personnel and equipment at Columbine High so soon after the shooting began appears HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS in terms of their possible involvement in some way with the mayhem and murder itself, as this contingent was apparently literally on the scene immediately — if not sooner.
Additionally we have noted that FBI personnel in riot gear were also on the scene at Columbine EXTREMELY QUICKLY–if you get the drift. I guess FBI riot squads and NATO vehicles and personnel just happened to be in the neighborhood of Columbine High School that morning. Okay…..
Adding additional weight to the reported presence of NATO personnel at Columbine, and even their complicity in the carnage itself is the following quote from Chris Wisher as quoted in the Boulder News on 04/21/99 in the article ‘Student Massacre:’ “They were just shooting everywhere,” said Wisher. According to Chris the suspect who shot at them was wearing a black coat, sunglasses and a BERET. Unfortunately I did not get into specifics regarding the assailants’ dress while asking him questions. The statement about the beret sounds an awful lot like he was describing a “Special Forces” type (European/NATO) military uniform.
Regrettably that channel of information seems likely to be cut off due to his parents’ attitudes.
The following email from Robert Dobarganes (specialprojectsres@netscape.net) contains yet further verification of military troops with NATO-like insignias on their clothing present at Columbine; AND evidence that at least SOME of the bombs and other explosive devices were NOT “backyard,” or “Anarchist Cookbook” type devices, but rather very hi-tech, military-related explosives!
“Another thing I found has to do with an insignia on a supposed SWAT team member dressed in military camo age fatigues which looks like a three-point white star with points bent. This can be seen in a photo on BBC News website….
“My son had mentioned a report he had heard on a local radio station he listens, to shortly after the attack about one (or more) of the bombs having “mercury switches” which certainly must mean it was a military explosive. Sounds alot like same type used in OKC blast. This apparently never made it to Internet news or print sources.”
In support of growing indications that NATO and/or other non-US military personnel were at the scene of the Columbine High School massacre are some questions put to Officer Steve Davis of the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Department on 4/22/99.
A reporter asked the identity of a 2-Star General on scene at the Columbine massacre shortly after it began. As this individual was reported not only in full dress but VERY CLOSE TO THE SCHOOL and CERTAINLY within any restricted perimeter set up by law enforcement, the possibility this person was US officer with a child at the school seems remote. In fact, as I saw this footage myself I can attest there was definitely a strong intimation in the reporter’s question that this guy was at the very LEAST, shall we say, “notably out of place.”
The reporter continued that the tape had been reviewed and the General’s presence positively verified. Sheriff Davis didn’t deny these facts but rather feebly and stutteringly contended he was unaware of any such person at Columbine.
If the TV crew was able zero in enough on the fellow to identify him as a 2-star general they would have EASILY been able to identify him by uniform as a “U.S.” general AND of which branch of the military; and would very likely have said so.
The entire tone of the questioning here had an undertone which could best be described as very pointed, yet guarded–almost as if the reporter KNEW the repercussions of the presence of a non-US military officer on the scene immediately in such a sensitive situation was quite explosive at the least.
So it is NOW CONFIRMED that a two-star general was at Columbine High School very soon after the massacre began!
Even if it were a US military officer, that in itself is a violation of the U.S. Constitution which EXPLICITLY FORBIDS military personnel being used in domestic situations for any reason whatsoever–with the exception of a state of MARTIAL LAW!
How much more a tremendous violation of the most fundamental structure of our nation it is then to have NON-U.S.military personnel so involved! And on top of it all in such an apparently suspicious way!
This news of NATO and/or other non-U.S. military personnel active on U.S. soil–ESPECIALLY IN CONNECTION WITH such a situation in which there is INDISPUTABLE evidence of coverup and conspiracy–is truly so outrageous as to almost defy comprehension: certainly any quick and easy comprehension. There are many, many DEEPLY DISTURBING implications. The immediate presence of NATO personnel at Columbine High at the time of the massacre is highly suspicious and may, along with evidence on types of explosives at Columbine as noted above, indicate their DIRECT involvement in the tragedy. Furthermore it’s undeniable that their ACTIVE presence ANYWHERE IN THIS COUNTRY is a tremendous, almost inconceivable outrage! Those political, military or other officials responsible for NATO personnel operating on American soil should be IMMEDIATELY ARRESTED, JAILED AND TRIED FOR HIGH TREASON!
Considering the obvious usurpation of the once relatively benign and purely defensive NATO and it’s military machine by New World Order proponents Blair, the Royal Family [who by the way own MASSIVE amounts of property in the DENVER AREA!], Clinton and even more so GORE, along with a staggeringly long list of other traitors and sellouts; AND considering the growing indications of a devious and fundamentally malicious NATO/NWO agenda in the mushrooming Balkans World War 3 warmup, the NATO presence at, and involvement in, the slaughter at Columbine High School would seem to auger EXTRAORDINARILY NEGATIVELY for the immediate future of our country.
Source

Walsh Butt Rape

Sheriff T.S. “Tim Walsh” is the ONLY law enforcement EVER to Arrest Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold. Where has Sheriff Walsh gone? Why was the criminal record of the boy buried in the original investigation? Is the Sheriff hiding something?
It’s clear that the real motive for the Columbine School shootings was to get back at the cops, the sheriffs. Why was the “January Incident” never investigated? Also, newly uncovered school video filmed in the cafeteria exposes a gaping question:
What else could be the “January Incident?”

THE BIG LIES


Big Lie #1: After releasing “ALL THE EVIDENCE” of 10,937 pages in the year 2000, another 30,000 pages have been produced by Court order and Freedom of Information Act retrieval. The investigation has never been completed; records are still undisclosed, the basement tapes are under seal and the depositions of the boys’ parents is sealed until 2027!
Big Lie #2: The Sheriff trying to pretend that this crime shouldn’t have been stopped long before it happened.
“No known evidence!” What a big fat lie. The Sheriff’s had been dealing with complaints and criminal conduct from Eric and Dylan since January of 1997, more than two years before the Columbine massacre. Actually, had Eric and Dylan’s bombs gone off, hundreds would have died, so it should really be referred to as both a shooting and a bombing.
Here’s a list of contacts between the Jefferson County Sheriff’s department and the two boys.
Big Lie #3: The bomb warrant was only a “draft affidavit,” and there “wasn’t enough evidence to serve it.” Ha! Read the fine print below:
On February 15, 1198, at 4:00 p.m. there was a report of a pipe bomb placed in the field near Garrison and Field street county of Jefferson State of Colorado. Investigator Glenn Grove, of the Jefferson County Bomb Squad, was dispatched to that location…. These items are consistent with material found in the type of commercial fireworks Harris described as components of his explosive devices.”
AND, here’s a copy of the bomb warrant that simply needed a judges signature in order to serve it. Why was the warrant never signed. Certainly, the sheriffs had plenty of evidence. They even had a recovered bomb!
And the real motive of Columbine? Killing cops, not jocks. If the boys were so concerned about the jocks how come they didn’t shoot the jocks and shoot up the gym or locker room? Easy; the jocks are a cover story planted by the investigators to keep the real culprit, Sheriff Deputy Timothy “J.S.” Walsh from being investigated over the “January Incident.”
Source

Official Documents/Notes

Columbine Report Pgs 001-100
Columbine Report Pgs 101-200
Columbine Report Pgs 201-300
Columbine Report Pgs 301-400
Columbine Report Pgs 401-500

Rooftop Snipers



Quoted from the 2000 Jefferson County Sheriff’s Report:
12:07    ·    Deputy Walker asks dispatch to check on the status of the party on the roof.
12:11    ·   The heating and air conditioning repairman, initially thought to be a possible sniper, is removed from the roof.
12:15    ·   A news helicopter lands at Clement Park.  Jefferson County Sheriff’s Sgt. Phil Domenico is put on board and uses the helicopter’s camera system to survey the school’s roof.  He remains in the helicopter for the next several hours surveying the area.
Supporting SWAT Teams Provide Valuable Assistance
“Denver Police Department put out a call to respond to Columbine about 11:30 a.m. and members of its team also went with the first ad hoc SWAT group advancing on the school.  Many of its members, armed with AR-15 rifles, provided suppression fire [but there are NO ballistics reports documenting where the bullets they fired ended up!  Also, how do you lay down “suppression fire” when you’ve got two shooters mixed up with hundreds of innocent students and teachers inside a large building?] during attempts to rescue down and wounded students outside or assisted in the rescues themselves.  Many also helped evacuate students from different areas of the school, assisting in establishing security protection for the evacuees, helped search and secure classrooms; provided cover as other SWAT team members freed them from the building, and assisted in clearing the roof of the school.”

And here is what we think that Sgt Domenico filmed from that News helicopter:
But in typical of it’s obfuscation of evidence, the Sheriff’s department does not cover the SWAT firing from the roof issue in it’s report:  That information comes out later after Mr. Rohrbough (as you will read further below) forced Jeffco to release the ballistics report in Court.  Instead the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Department, in response to multiple reports of rooftop snipers, comes up with this lame photo in it’s official and “complete” 2000 report.

Columbine families seek to track each bullet
By Howard Pankratz
Denver Post Legal Affairs Writer
May 31, 2000 -The ballistics report on the weapons and bullets from the Columbine massacre fails to identify who fired the shots that killed and wounded each victim.
That was the chief complaint from a lawyer who represents several victims’ families upon Tuesday’s release of the 58-page report by the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office.
“What we lack is the real underlying evidence,” said Jim Rouse.
Rouse represents the family of slain student Daniel Rohrbough. In a federal wrongful-death lawsuit against the sheriff’s department, the family claims 15-year-old Daniel was killed outside the school by a deputy sheriff’s bullet. Rouse says the claim is based on two eyewitnesses and the autopsy report.
He has declined to identify the witnesses, and the autopsy report remains sealed.
Sheriff’s officials deny the allegation, claiming that Rohrbough was killed by Dylan Klebold.
Rouse said the ballistics report doesn’t change his assessment because it doesn’t provide enough information.
“We have not seen anything in the ballistics report that would change that allegation,” Rouse said. “We were hoping it would tell us what bullets were found where and from what guns those bullets were fired.” The report identifies the four guns used by killers Klebold and Eric Harris, the guns used by officers at the scene, and also documents the multitude of shells, cartridges and fragments recovered at the school. It also examines the relationship of the weapons to the recovered shells and items.
But to determine who fired the bullets that killed the specific victims, Rouse said he needs to see the 200 volumes of backup materials upon which the massive final investigative report was based.
“We have no crime scene photos,” Rouse said. “We don’t know what bullets were found where. We don’t have witness statements. All we’ve got are conclusory reports that don’t shed light on what we are looking for.” Rouse’s clients filed an Open Records Act lawsuit against the county in April for release of the ballistics report and numerous other Columbine-related materials.
Jefferson County District Judge Brooke Jackson has ordered nearly all the material released, but he has yet to rule on whether the 200 volumes must be disclosed.
In the Columbine report, the sheriff’s department said law officers fired 141 rounds at Columbine. Twelve officers fired their weapons: four from Jefferson County; seven from the Denver Police Department; and one from the Lakewood Police Department.
Klebold and Harris fired 188 shots.
Among the information in Tuesday’s report were descriptions of the ammunition pouches carried by the two killers. Recovered were three “green canvas ammunition pouches,” and one tan canvas pouch marked “Nikon” with dark brown trim with the name “Klebold” written on the back.
Also recovered was one large, double-stacked metal magazine, which had a 50-round capacity plus 40 live rounds of 9mm Luger caliber ammunition. Numerous 9mm magazines were recovered.
Several families said they did not plan to immediately pick up the report, echoing sentiment expressed after the release of the investigative report two weeks ago. And Mike Kirklin – whose son, Lance, suffered multiple gunshot wounds in the attack – said he was told the report might be difficult to decipher without some knowledge of ballistics.
“They told me I might have trouble reading it,” Kirklin said.
Source

Photos

Links & Videos

The Full Columbine Report (PDFs)
Surveillance Tapes and Shooters’ Home Videos
10 years later, the real [ha!] story behind Columbine
Columbine: Anatomy of a Coverup
Alex Jones Exposed as a Cultleader & Columbine Cover-up Artist
File offers glimpse of angry, suicidal boy by mama4paws
David Chase
Dylan Klebold’s Journal
Columbine Student Reports Three Gunmen (Vid Opens In Popup)
Littleton Witness Account: Gunman Not Student
Programmed To Kill/Satanic Cover-Up Part 12
Franklin Coverup
Columbine High School Memorials
Dylan Klebold’s Writing
The Phone Call
FBI on Columbine: “Bombs Too Sophisticated” (Vid In Popup)
Columbine High School Shootings Coverup
Eric Harris’ Webpages
Columbine Eyewitness Reports Three Individuals — One Arrested (Vid Opens In Popup)
Police Reports for Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold
Eric Harris’s Writing
Autopsy PROVES Columbine Victim Slain by Law Enforcement
The Columbine Documents (Huge PDF)
Weapons & Gear
Columbine conspiracy theories (Wiki)
The Adult Who Helped?
Share.










  • Archives

     
  •  
  • [End of Article Page -- Clare note Oct 6 2015]