Tuesday, 26 February 2013

Those caskets at Sandy Hook

UPDATE Apr 4, 2013:
I notice that a Google search (but not an AOL search) for "Sandy Hook Hair Co." is listing THIS post ... because of some notes I made below under comments and NOT listing the appropriate post. If you wish to see my comments here, then fine, but for direct info if you came here to find info on "SHH... Co." please go to the appropriate post at http://youcanknowsometimes.blogspot.ca/2013/01/sh-hair-co-shh-bloody-handprint.html


Well, here's a summary of what we know about some of the behaviour of parents and at funerals:

This was sent to a friend of mine on Youtube, by username ... [withheld by request]

sandy hook kids & open caskets---Veronique Pozner gave a 1.5 hr interview to "The Forward" in which she said she covered Notah's lower face w/ a Jewish scarf & did have the casket open during the private funeral. I assume you're a 'truther' in which case I also recommend you see the video of the boisterous, loud, dry-eyed eulogy she gave at his funeral w/ only a hint of a hitch in her voice. Also, be sure to see in that article that she says her hubby had already gone to Florida to manage his grief w/ friends & this was only about a week after the funeral!

Grace McDonnell was cremated.
Jessica Rekos had a closed coffin.
Monsignor Weiss giggled uncontrollably in a telephone interview (with Huffington Post I believe) WHILE discussing the deaths! They've scrubbed the audio off the internet now but several people heard it & it's been commented on on boards that discuss the Sandy HOok Hoax.

Hope you don't think I'm strange... just spreading information.

Also, Sally Cox, the nurse--she said she locked eyes w/ the gunman & his mom was a kindergrtn teacher there?... then she changed her story hours later. We think she ID'd Scott Vollmer. He's associated w/ Bloomberg. The Stephen Barton connection in my other videos is rather blockbuster too. Okay . Out!

Monday, 25 February 2013

Video reference: all the views of 2nd "hit" to WTC on 9/11

A list from the following Youtube video's description comments:

"The 2nd World Trade Center Attack: 43 angles"
Uploaded on Jun 10, 2010

Nearly all the known angles of the 2nd plane hitting the South Tower of the WTC at 9:02:54 (seismic data) or 9:03:11 (9/11 Commission Report). All here: http://www.911conspiracy.tv/2nd_hit.html
Contents: 1. ABC LIVE via WCBS-AM Chopper 880 traffic cam (replay 1 minute after actual attack)
2. Naka Nathaniel New York Times (distant, face shot obscured by Woolworth building)
3. CBS LIVE #1 (closeup barely catches plane - more visible in archive footage)
4. CBS LIVE #2 ("replay" of plane descending behind towers - "divebomber")
5. Edited NBC-MSNBC LIVE #1 with well timed cut to the extreme closeup edited out by clip creator Xenomorph911WTC - see live archive)
6. Park Foreman, amateur at 1:30, aired 9/11 evening, first as still pictures at 3:14pm on CNN... 7. "tinacart" (YouTube channel), at 1:43, unknown amateur shot broadcast on 9/11 (with explicit language included)
8. Brooklyn Bridge shot mistakenly linked to Al Qaeda website by media in 12/2003 -- yet it played in many docu's from 2002 on.
9. Scott Myers
10. Naudet (see documentary titled 9|11)
11. Earth Station (unknown videographer, footage discovered at earthstation1.com
12. "tinacart" 9/11 witness reactions #2
13. Ronald Pordy
14. Luis Alonso
15. WB11
16. Michael Hezarkhani at 3:53 - face impact - rights of video sold to CNN
17. Pavel Hlava, first aired September 2003 - face impact. Watch stabilized version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLKJ3U...
18. "Shizzzham" (YouTube 2007 - face impact)
19. Jen S. (zoomed face impact)
20. "Mindblower" unknown, (poor quality face impact)
21. Evan Fairbanks at 4:53 (face impact broadcast 9/11 evening without audio)
22. Gary Pollard - CameraPlanet Archive clip at 5:04 - see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jg0tcq...
23. Brian Gately (Camera Planet)
24. History.com, unknown amateur (distant face impact)
25. Luc C. (face impact closeup with audio)
26. WNYW LIVE FOX5 Chopper 5
27. History Channel, unknown amateur
28. "rocer" (SAMPLE text obscures video)
29. NY1 "LIVE" but not
30. CBS 9:05 am "replay" from behind Empire State Building
31. Devin Clark - tinacart 3 - bodyatomic.com
32. Peter Strid (YouTube user peterstrid, uploaded 2006)
33. Gamma Press (at 7:58, BBC version) - amateur
34. CBS 11 amateur shot from North
35. BBC World, distant amateur zoom from water
36. "Jersey Shore" shot, BBC version
37. FOX5 "Marta" hi res version - blue tinted
38. "Columbine shot" - featured in Michael Moore's film Bowling for Columbine - unknown amateur
39. CNN 9:10 am
40. Spiegel TV, unknown amateur zoomed face shot
41. Clifton Cloud
42. PAX-TV (FOX5 version) - fast birds
43. WNBC - MSNBC "leaning towers" http://www.911conspiracy.tv

More on denying Sandy Hook death records to reporters

Let's look at this positively: it means a lot of reporters are asking, and since some are asking for ALL of the e-mail correpondence from the Town Clerk, it means some reporters are suspicious. They can't get anything out of those higher up, so they try for information (too far) low down on the totem pole.


Newtown seeks to deny newspapers access to death certificates
By Ralph Lopez
Feb 21, 2013 in World

The Newtown, Connecticut Town Clerk is seeking to deny newspapers from viewing public record death certificates of Sandy Hook victims, according to the Newtown Bee.

The Clerk maintains that access to vital records such as death and marriage certificates should be limited to immediate family members or their representatives, and has undertaken to change present law.

The New York Post, the Connecticut Post, the Associated Press, the Hartford Courant, and other media have put forth requests for official death certificates of Sandy Hook victims, the Newton Bee report says. Newtown Town Clerk Debbie Aurelia says she is working with State Representatives Dan Carter, Mitch Bolinsky, and the leadership of the state association of town clerks to craft state legislation:

"that would provide the press and public with limited directory information from death and marriage records, but would withhold the actual death and marriage certificates."

Death certificates are part of vital public records, which also include birth and marriage certificates. They are public domain documents used, ultimately, to determine official recognition of presence or past presence in civil society. They also serve as a mechanism for upholding the integrity of information in which there is a public interest, as it relates to voting, citizenship, and receiving public benefits. Abuses of voting processes involving voters who, unbeknownst to the public, are actually dead, are legendary.

Death certificates typically contain little information about manner of death beyond categories such as "natural cause," "homicide," "accident," "suicide," or "other." News organizations utilize such records in crime reporting as a standard part of normal, often tedious, fact-checking procedures. Death certificates also contain the sworn statement of the medical examiner.

The Newtown Bee stated:

"Ms Aurelia said she has received requests for death certificates and other proprietary information from the New York Post , the Connecticut Post , the Associated Press and the Hartford Courant among others."
"Some are also requesting all my e-mail correspondence and text messages related to 12/14," she said."

According to the Newtown Bee, Assistant Town Clerk Renee Weimann said "I feel it’s my responsibility to protect these victims. They’ve been through enough.” Last December 14th, 20 children and 8 adults died in a shooting rampage by alleged shooter Adam Lanza.

Ms Aurelia and members of her staff testified in favor of such a bill at a hearing of the state's Public Health Committee last February 20th. The law would also exclude members of the public who are not "immediate family/authorized agency/attorney" from viewing the records, according to the Newtown Bee.

The Bee reported that the media and other sources have been making the requests under existing Freedom of Information Act laws. Media can take local, state, and federal government agencies to court over failure to comply with requests for information.

 The move comes as the public awaits the answers to questions such as whether or not alleged shooter Adam Lanza was on any psychiatric medications, especially those known as SSRIs which some psychiatrists maintain have been associated with thousands of incidents of random violence, and have a causal effect. Also lacking is any further elaboration on a Connecticut State's Attorney's statement last December, in a court motion, that there may be other "potential suspects," and that revealing certain evidence at this time might "seriously jeopardize" the investigation. Connecticut State's Attorney Stephen Sedensky also said that revealing certain evidence at this time might:

"identify persons cooperating with the investigation, thus possibly jeopardizing their personal safety and well-being."

Yesterday the Hartford Courant ran a report in which Jim Smith, president of the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information, said a death certificate is a factual document that lacks the details of an autopsy report. The Courant quotes Smith saying:

“There isn’t anything in a death certificate that is going to hurt the deceased...it’s not like an autopsy report. It’s been public for centuries. It’s not going to invade anyone’s privacy.’’

CT State Representatives Bolinsky and Carter, and Newtown Town Clerk Aurelia, all argued, according to the Courant, that identify theft was a concern, since the maiden name of the deceased's mother is on death certificates. However, this is also on birth certificates, which are not a target of the trio. Also, the proposed legislation would seal the death records only of minors under 18. It is unclear why identity thieves would not merely steal the identities of people over that age.

Read more: http://digitaljournal.com/article/343981#ixzz2LvwsrLXB

Aaron Green, Morgan Gliedman

Below, is an article asking if these two got off as non-terrorists because they're white.

 Why the protection for these two? That they're white? Certainly there's an impression of and intention (if one knows of 9/11 as a fraud) to paint non-whites as the scary kooks of the world most of the time, and this would be part of why in general whites might get off more easily, but could there be another reason?

Well: Yes, the idea generally promotes is that the brown people or foreign whites are the terrorists (Breivik comes to mind), but in this case, how about this ... Aaron and Morgan are white, yes, but if they're low-end agents (and possibly for Mossad as well, though not necessarily), they'd be protected if the operation was accidentally raided?

We know the white terrorists, the Weathermen were protected (though temporarily caught and properly imprisoned), that McVeigh was white but called a major terrorist, and so on. So whites can be called terrorists, too. In the case of the Weather Underground, the operation seems to have entailed main fanatic ringleaders (probably partly believing their own Intelligence Agency rhetoric), and some other fall guy hangers-on. And the operation to bust the efforts of the SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) having roughly worked, and also having worked to accomplish the disarray of the New York City Teachers' Strike, which could have been a positive cross-racial and financial paradigm for the country, the Weathermen were imprisoned. They later escaped and you can read what's up with them now. But of course, McVeigh was killed; why the difference?

He was white and a terrorist (which was my main point, because the article below is asking if Green and Gleidman are non-terrorists because they're white). But he, unlike some (such as the Weathermen), was killed. If you research the OKC Bombing, you'll find there was far more involved than McVeigh as lone fanatic. As such, the story situation and physical finds being quite a different problem than rabble-rousing and threatening small bombs of the overt Weathermen kind, led McVeigh to the slaughter as lone-nut fall guy.

So, here's the social-prejudice-only article (link and a copy of the):


Aaron Green and Morgan Gliedman: Why White People Get a Free Pass When It Comes to Terrorism
[by:] Tom McKay
in Politics, National Security

[Photo of Aaron standing in court with police behind him and lawyer beside him, misidentified in caption as Morgan]

On Saturday morning, NYPD officers raided a Greenwich Village apartment in New York City. They found an arsenal: two shotguns (one a sawed-off Mossberg 500, the other a $1,000+ Ruger over-under hunting shotgun), high-capacity magazines and tracer ammunition, shotgun shells, a replica M203 grenade launcher designed to launch flares, and a vial containing 7 grams of a white powder later identified as HMTD, a high-power and extremely unstable explosive. The bomb squad was called in. Police later found an array of disturbing manuals, including "The Terrorist's Encyclopedia V. 102," guides to improvised firearms including a DIY manual for the construction of a sub-machine gun, and Army manuals for constructing and placing traps and bombs. Two individuals with murky connections to anti-government activities were arrested.

Sounds like a clear media field day, right? Wrong. Almost immediately, news organizations were near-universally reporting that the accused, 31-year-old Aaron Green (a Harvard graduate), and girlfriend Morgan Gliedman, 27, were not terrorists. They were just relatively harmless drug addicts.

The Daily Beast reports that police quickly reached the "tentative conclusion that the explosives and weapons were just part of a drug-fueled, twisted sense of what constitutes cool," a high-ranking police source saying "it looks like they're junkies … well-to-do junkies, not terrorists."

Would it be reasonable to, in the lack of available evidence suggesting otherwise, accuse these two of being terrorists? Of course not. That would be ridiculous, right? Fortunately for Green and Gliedman, the two happen to be relatively attractive, wealthy white people. That gives them a certain degree of immunity from the media and the police.

Is there any doubt that if their skin was a different color or the two were adherents to a non-Western religion, the media would be reporting a different story: that of an alleged terror plot, even without evidence of a plot to back up those accusations?

In November 2001, Dick Cheney implemented what is known as the "1 percent doctrine," which holds that even if there is a "1 percent chance" that a terrorist threat is credible, "we have to treat it as a certainty" in terms of response. This directive may have made sense in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks, but it has also directly led to widespread targeting of the Muslim community over the past decade. The Bush administration's securitization initiatives helped propel a wave of paranoia about terrorists, creating an endless cycle of terrorism speculation and media cheerleading or acceptance of spurious moves against the Muslim community.

Countless Muslims, Sikhs, and other minorities have been endlessly hassled, interrogated, or accused by the authorities since 9/11. The military even prosecuted an Army chaplain for a number of false charges such as "spying, espionage, mishandling classified documents, mutiny and fraternizing with the enemy," apparently for the crime of attempting to "improve awareness of Islam and the Muslim culture" at Guantanamo Bay. Muslims, Asian-Americans, and Arab-Americans have all faced a consistent atmosphere of racial profiling and government surveillance since 9/1; Rutgers professor Sylvia Chan-Malik claims "the notion that Islam is the 'enemy' and Muslims are not to be trusted is a central logic through which institutions and individuals make decisions these days," citing recent NYPD surveillance of Muslim communities and the recent shooting at a Sikh temple which killed six people in Wisconsin.

Of course, we don't extend this surveillance to the upstanding white community. In 2010, anti-government extremist Andrew Joseph Stack flew a plane into an IRS building, killing himself and an IRS manager. Thirteen others were injured, two of them severely. He left a manifesto and may have loaded his single-engine Piper Dakota with extra fuel to ensure extra damage was inflicted in the attack. Bombing-scale damage appears to have been inflicted in the attack.

Yet Fox News and other organizations repeatedly reported the incident as either an "anti-IRS suicide" or profiled Stack as "generally easygoing, a talented amateur musician with marital troubles and a maddening grudge" against the IRS. Muslim groups petitioned the government to label the attack as an "act of terror" but were rebutted. Conservative Representative Steve King (R-Iowa) personified the 'white people aren't terrorists' creed of thinking by personally saying he "[understood] the deep frustration with the IRS," and claiming if the U.S. had abolished the IRS "back when I first advocated it, [Stack] wouldn't have had a target for his airplane."

Even the Sikh temple shooting, conducted by known neo-Nazi Wade Michael Page, apparently passes the terrorism smell test. The Sikh community was recently disappointed by the FBI's lack of ability to even tie the shootings to systemic racism (which "could not be demonstrated as the reason Page shot up the gurdwara," despite a "strong tradition" of white supremacist 'lone wolf attacks'), let alone terrorism.

Compare this with the Republican Party's reactionary and infantile response to the DHS' labeling of right-wing extremists as potential sources of domestic terrorists. Then-House Minority Leader, and now Speaker, Representative John Boehner (R-Ohio) accused DHS of "using [the term 'terrorism'] to describe American citizens who disagree with the direction Washington Democrats are taking our nation." Experts such as Middle Eastern history scholar Juan Cole have detailed how the U.S. media has been complicit in maintaining the distinction between white and nonwhite perpetrators of violence.

As Cole mentions, "the family of a white terrorist is interviewed, weeping as they wonder where he went wrong. The families of other terrorists are almost never interviewed." How telling, then, that the Daily Beast piece on the raid emphasizes the possibility "the raid on the apartment was the best thing that could have happened for her child, who can now expect to begin life in the New Year away from explosives and guns."

I doubt that if a Muslim-American woman's apartment were found with that stockpile of weapons the Beast would elicit such sympathy.

Strangely, accusations of terrorism seem mainly directed at relatively powerless groups, including those also accused of political dissidence. The FBI and the DHS apparently met with high-ranking Wall Street officials to direct "treating protests against the corporate and banking structure of America as potential criminal and terrorist activity."

That's just here, in our relatively human-rights-friendly corner of the world. The Associated Press reports that labeling political dissidents and minority communities as potential terrorists is even worse overseas. Over 35,000 people have been convicted as terrorists, with over 120,000 arrests, "at the urging and with the funding of the West." With Turkey and China accounting for over half the convictions alone, it seems highly unlikely that all those accused are guilty of terrorism – or anything approaching it. The U.S.' blanket endorsement of harsh counter-terrorism laws has helped provide cover and active support for governments to deploy those laws against similarly disadvantaged communities as well.

The end effect in the U.S? Those communities have little recourse, and feel victimized and oppressed.

"The fear is that, if at any point, you come into contact, whether intentional or not, with someone who later becomes a criminal, or later becomes a suspect or terrorist, that taint can never be scrubbed off," said Elizabeth Dan, the outreach director of NYU's Muslim Law Students Association.

A taint that does not, apparently, extend to white Americans.

Picture Credit: REUTERS/Steven Hirsch/Pool

Thursday, 21 February 2013

Restricted access to Sandy Hook records proposed

Sandy Hook fallout: Proposal to Restrict Death Certificates http://www.legitgov.org/Sandy-Hook-fallout-Proposal-Restrict-Death-Certificates

Sandy Hook Fallout: Proposal to Restrict Death Certificates
February 22, 2013 by legitgov

Sandy Hook Fallout: Proposal to Restrict Death Certificates --Requests for kids' records dismay lawmakers --GOP Rep refers to reporters who seek info as 'jackals' 21 Feb 2013 [Note: This is a summary of an article, written by Christopher Keating and William Weir, that appeared in Thursday's Hartford Courant (hard copy), but for some reason did not 'make it' to the Courant's website.] A Newtown official's distress over reporters' requests for death certificates after the Dec. 14 schoolhouse shootings has led to a bill that would restrict public access to the records for any children younger than age 18. State Rep. Mitch Bolinsky, a freshman Republican lawmaker from Newtown, testified to a committee Wednesday that legislators "need to do something." "I was shocked, dismayed and deeply disturbed when, on Dec. 17, I got a call from the town clerk about the prospect of having a reporter standing beside her during one of the greatest tragedies in the history of the United States in Newtown looking for death certificates of children," Bolinsky said. Bolinksky said he felt "the outrage, the pain of observing the jackals descend upon my town clerk's office at a time of great, great community loss." Bolinksy introduced the one-paragraph bill, which states that the copy of the public record could be restricted "when the disclosure of the death certificate is likely to cause undue hardship for the family of the child."

Tuesday, 19 February 2013

Adam Lanza as Norway shooter

For what it's worth -- and that's not much except that every nonsensical thing must be replied to, unfortunately -- mainstream news media have, today, been comparing Adam Lanza as Newtown Sandy Hook Elementary School shooter, to Breivik as Norway shooter.


How ridiculous. This goes only skin deep, as if both lone nutter idealists merely wanted lots of kids to shoot.

This is supposedly because Lanza wanted to shoot up many more classrooms worth of people (children). And because they (the police) found articles about Breivik in the Lanza home (supposedly).

However, it behooves us to remember that Breivik also set off a bomb outside the Norwegian government buildings, the president of Norway was supposed to be at the island with children, and there's a helicopter picture of Breivik where there supposedly were no helicopters in the air that day.

Breivik has been called by versions of his last name from several countries -- Poland, England, Norway. His many connections to these countries and England's fame for harbouring terrorists for operations (though many fight and "watch" the terrorists, they end up being a safe haven for double agents and so on, which British MI5 & 6 can also treasonously run international operations from), plus his connections to gunrunners and drug lords and their occultic interests all indicate he was a fanatic who was an agent or used by agents. The camp of children he was killing at on the island was a camp promoting pro-Palestinian rights. If Breivik was an anti-Palestinian, pro-fanatic Israeli ideology agent as patsy, then the fact that the bust of several people in Greenwich Village after the Newtown shooting revealed they had been going there from Newtown and were going possibly going to an Israeli safe house (intelligence service hotbed) MAY be the real connections between some operators at both shootings.

Update Feb. 21, 2013:
On the question of the Israeli safe house idea, let me pull from the comments on this blog, below, for thoughts on both sides of that question:

bpete196919 February 2013 18:03

On Aaron Greene and Morgan Gliedman...there was no Israeli "safe house". If your source is Duff he's taking you down a rabbit hole.

"Since the arrests, police alleged Green told acquaintances late last year that he planned to blow up the Washington Square Park arch. Also uncovered were undated letters that he wrote, including one with the words "kill them all" and signed with a Nazi SS lightning bolt symbol still used by neo-Nazi groups, police said."...huffington post

"Though Greene's motives remain unclear, investigators have uncovered undated letters that he wrote, including one with the words "kill them all" and signed with a Nazi SS lightning bolt symbol still used by neo-Nazi groups, police said. Other witnesses also have told police that they heard Greene boast that his grandfather was a Nazi, they added."...CBS news

Duff has claimed that there was satellite surveillance following a purple van full of Da Jooos from Sandy Hook back to their apartment. Don't buy it....

Clare Kuehn21 February 2013 06:46

It's from satellite footage, yes, according to Duff. Duff is fanatic but he's dedicated. He DOES SPEAK of the FINDING of Nazi paraphernalia at the safe house (if it was one). -- Now I know and you should know too, that there could be levels of disinfo: Duff believes the Israelis do most things (in a sense) so someone could have talked to him about Nazis and suggested the Israeli safe house idea as a cover, or it could be the other way around. One way or another, it seems there was some satellite footage.

If you're right, then great.

I don't know personally, of course, what the heck is true and not true in this instance.

[End of Update Feb. 21, 2013]

In other words, Israel (not as a country, but as a hotbed of ideology and intelligence operations, as all countries have) may have played a role in both events. And in Breivik's actions, at least, so might Britain have taken part in getting the shooting going (again not as a country or region, but as having its own cabals of rogue agency actions). The president of Norway was moving to support Palestinian statehood as a right, for the then-upcoming vote in the UN.

The police took a ridiculously long time to get to the island. And many persons on the island (kids) said they saw more than one shooter.

There is even a suggestion that the police called to Breivik by name; though this may be confusion in translation (that they called out to him, but not by name), it may also be that they did, because he was part of a known drill. He may well have been part of a drill at some point as well or that this was a known drill gone live, even if they did not call out using his name.

So, the resemblance is superficial at best, when compared to Adam Lanza's purported actions at Newtown; the real resemblance is through operations and drills. Lieutenant Vance of Newtown specifically stated that there was a drill which was live, an "active shooter drill" at a "school nearby", which can only be St Rose of Lima, about a mile from Sandy Hook Elementary. In fact, videographic shots from a helicopter of the latter school and police rushing in were shown on local TV as if they were at Sandy Hook Elementary. There are some videos showing this footage, on Youtube, and there was a caller to Alex Jones' Infowars / Prisonplanet show that day stating the same thing. Note that the drill at St Rose (presumably) was a live drill, not only a classroom preparation for possible school shootings several miles away, in Bridgeport, Connecticut, which was ALSO taking place, possibly related in personnel to the drill going on in Newtown, though the two may be coincidental without significance.

Wednesday, 13 February 2013

Egyptian Nasserist defends visit to "pan-Arabist" Assad of Syria

Egyptian Nasserist defends controversial visit to Syria’s Al-Assad


Co-founder of Egyptian Nasserist Party, Farouq El-Eshri, defends meeting with Bashar Al-Assad, who[m] he describes as 'the last line of defence for Pan-Arabism'

Ahram Online, Wednesday 13 Feb 2013

[Photo: Reuters:] Syrian president Bashar Al-Assad

“Our visit to Syria in support of Bashar Al-Assad came out of our genuine intention to back the resistance against American and Zionist plans in the region,” Farouq El-Eshri, co-founder of the ENP told Al-Ahram Arabic website.

The delegation had no intention of meeting with the Syrian opposition at the moment, he added.

Around 60,000 people have been killed during an ongoing two-year uprising against the Al-Assad government.

The meeting with Al-Assad on Tuesday did not find any solutions to the Syrian crisis, El-Eshri added, because no one can end it now.

“If Bashar falls, we are left with three scenarios: 1. the fall of ‘Arab Nationalist’ Syria, 2. Syria will fall under the rule of the Muslim Brotherhood, 3. It will be a civil war.”

Syria is the last defence line for Pan-Arabism, El-Eshri added.

Bashar Al-Assad is also the leader of the Arab Socialist Ba’ath Party in Syria.

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

New 'Suspicionless' Seizure of personal electronics approved

"Civil Rights Watchdog Branch of DHS" approves.


You saw this? The grip is tightening. Now, the Fourth Amendment is becoming virtually meaningless, all in the name of "national security" ... another grandchild of 9/11.


DHS Watchdog OKs ‘Suspicionless’ Seizure of Electronic Devices Along Border


By David Kravets 02.08.13 1:20 PM

The Department of Homeland Security’s civil rights watchdog has concluded that travelers along the nation’s borders may have their electronics seized and the contents of those devices examined for any reason whatsoever — all in the name of national security.

The DHS, which secures the nation’s border, in 2009 announced that it would conduct a “Civil Liberties Impact Assessment” of its suspicionless search-and-seizure policy pertaining to electronic devices “within 120 days.” [ http://www.dhs.gov/news/2009/08/27/new-directives-border-searches-electronic-media ] More than three years later, the DHS office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties published a two-page executive summary of its findings.

“We also conclude that imposing a requirement that officers have reasonable suspicion in order to conduct a border search of an electronic device would be operationally harmful without concomitant civil rights/civil liberties benefits,” the executive summary said. [ http://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/crcl-border-search-impact-assessment_01-29-13_1.pdf ]

The memo highlights the friction between today’s reality that electronic devices have become virtual extensions of ourselves housing everything from e-mail to instant-message chats to photos and our papers and effects — juxtaposed against the government’s stated quest for national security.

The President George W. Bush administration first announced the suspicionless, electronics search rules in 2008. The President Barack Obama administration followed up with virtually the same rules a year later. Between 2008 and 2010, 6,500 persons had their electronic devices searched along the U.S. border, [ http://www.aclu.org/national-security/government-data-about-searches-international-travelers-laptops-and-personal-electr ] according to DHS data.

According to legal precedent, the Fourth Amendment — the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures — does not apply along the border. By the way, the government contends the Fourth-Amendment-Free Zone stretches 100 miles [ http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2008/10/aclu-assails-10 ] inland from the nation’s actual border.

Civil rights groups like the American Civil Liberties Union suggest that “reasonable suspicion” should be the rule, at a minimum, despite that being a lower standard than required by the Fourth Amendment.

“There should be a reasonable, articulate reason why the search of our electronic devices could lead to evidence of a crime,” Catherine Crump, an ACLU staff attorney, said in a telephone interview. “That’s a low threshold.”

The DHS watchdog’s conclusion isn’t surprising, as the DHS is taking that position in litigation in which the ACLU is challenging the suspicionless, electronic-device searches and seizures along the nation’s borders. But that conclusion nevertheless is alarming considering it came from the DHS civil rights watchdog, which maintains its mission is “promoting respect for civil rights and civil liberties.”

“This is a civil liberties watchdog office. If it is doing its job property, it is supposed to objectively evaluate. It has the power to recommend safeguards to safeguard Americans’ rights,” Crump said. “The office has not done that and the public has the right to know why.”

Toward that goal, the ACLU on Friday filed a Freedom of Information Act request demanding to see the full report [ http://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty-immigrants-rights-national-security/aclu-files-foia-request-unreleased ] that the executive summary discusses.

Meantime, a lawsuit the ACLU brought on the issue concerns a New York man whose laptop was seized along the Canadian border in 2010 and returned 11 days later after his attorney complained.

At an Amtrak inspection point, Pascal Abidor showed his U.S. passport to a federal agent. He was ordered to move to the cafe car, where they removed his laptop from his luggage and “ordered Mr. Abidor to enter his password,” [ http://www.aclu.org/blog/technology-and-liberty-immigrants-rights-national-security/aclu-files-foia-request-unreleased -- yes, same link as last one] according to the lawsuit.

Agents asked him about pictures they found on his laptop, which included Hamas and Hezbollah rallies. He explained that he was earning a doctoral degree at a Canadian university on the topic of the modern history of Shiites in Lebanon.

He was handcuffed and then jailed for three hours while the authorities looked through his computer while numerous agents questioned him, according to the suit, which is pending in New York federal court.

Pope resigns: money fall guy?

Could Ratzinger be resigning due to his usefulness as an also-corrupt fall guy for others' big crimes?
Article follows.


Papal Coup d'Etat - The Vatican is a Criminal Power Unto Itself


Money Scandal Behind Papal Coup d'Etat
February 11, 2013

Left, The Ex Pope and the New Pope? Joseph Ratzinger (l) and the palace coup-master, Cardinal Bertone

To understand the Pope's resignation, Kevin Annett says, "Follow the money."

"What sounded the death knell on Pope Benedict was his personal involvement in the bribery and money-laundering practices of the Vatican Bank."

by Kevin Annett (henrymakow.com)

Theories are abounding now that the first pope in seven centuries is resigning his office. But as always, the most direct way to the truth behind the world's oldest corporation is simply to follow the money: and specifically, Vatican Bank money.

First of all, let's put to rest, the fallacy that "looming scandals" about child rape and cover-up are behind Joseph Ratzinger's resignation. That's just the cover story.

Nobody in the church hierarchy is losing sleep over their standing, canon-law endorsed policy of concealing and protecting child rapists in their ranks. Even the International Criminal Court application about such crimes has been stymied by catholic-run legislators and jurists.

What sounded the death knell on Pope Benedict was his personal involvement in the bribery and money-laundering practices of the Vatican Bank, comically known as The Institute of Religious Works (IOR); and how that dirty connection gave the anti-Ratzinger faction in the College of Cardinals the lever they needed to dump the obstinate German from the papal throne.

We had a whiff of that dump-Rat Boy agenda last year, when "Vatileaks" broke a ludicrous story of how Ratzinger's loyal butler Paolo Gabriele disclosed the pope's dirty secrets to the Italian media. In fact, the damning documents detailing Ratzinger's secret rewarding of Vatican contracts to his friends and family members originated in the Vatican Secretary of State's office, which the fall-guy butler could not have had access to.

The Secretary of State and the real power behind the papacy is Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, an old insider who also engineered the sacking of Gotti Tedeschi, head of the Vatican Bank, last May.

Tedeschi had taken seriously the call of the European Parliament for "greater transparency" by the Vatican Bank /IOR, and was about to disclose to Brussels how his bosses had been laundering money for the mob for decades. The last Pope who had tried such a disclosure, John Paul 1, died from poisoning in September, 1978 after less than a month in office.

But even with Tedeschi silenced, the IOR house of cards kept tumbling, as the European Parliament seized from it 300 million Euros fraudulently acquired. Even the American Securities and Exchange Commission declared the IOR's assets and practices "insecure". A major Vatican housecleaning was required; or at least, the appearance of one.

It was the pivotal Cardinal Bertone who leaked the pope's diary and other incriminating papers to a catholic-friendly journalist in Rome last year the same month that Tedeschi was sacked, to prepare the world for Ratzinger's removal. For it is Bertone who is now reaping the benefits of the papal housecleaning. He is not only a primary contender for the pope's position but a key player in the IOR.

During my second speaking tour in Rome, in the spring of 2010, I met with several senior Italian senators and officials of the parliamentary Radical Party. They all said the same thing about why Joseph Ratzinger had been made pope, and what awaited him. To quote one of those politicians,

"Nobody becomes pope without a sordid past, because only with such liabilities can he be controlled by the Curia. It's the same in any big company. Well, Ratzinger made many indiscretions as a Cardinal and made many enemies. His signing letters ordering criminal concealment was just one sin. He was to be the scapegoat for all of the trash that the church knew would surface"


So now, the papal scapegoat is gone, pensioned off to wherever ex-popes end up; and the time for the big face-saving lie has arrived.

The idea of applying cosmetic surgery to a decaying facade like the Church of Rome reminds me of Shirley Maclaine trying to look forty at the age of ninety. And yet appearances are everything in show business as well as in religion.

Tarcisio Bertone is about as institutional as you can get, and represents the old Italian crowd of the Curia, who are part of the Mob-government-papal clique that run the country and the Roman Catholic church. In the words of one of the Roman Senators I spoke with,

"You must understand that in my country, the Mafia and the government and the Vatican are all the same people, and they really have only one concern: protecting their assets."

Bertone, or whoever from the ranks of his victorious faction does assume the papal tiria, cannot be expected to do much but maintain the assets and security of the church, and that means continuing the policies of silence and dissimulation that keeps the cash flowing. But their position is more difficult now in the wake of the enormous rifts developing within the wider church, where Cardinals are facing criminal prosecution for shielding child rapists, and talk of disaffiliating from Rome is widespread among Irish, American and German Bishops.

"We have all the grounds for a second Reformation now. That's how serious is the crisis. The church will either rid itself of itself or face collapse" said an Italian media commentator recently.

It was easy to despise Joseph Ratzinger: the Hitler Youth raised, reactionary bigot who sacked liberal and independent thinkers in his church as the Cardinal-head of the Vatican Inquisition, and who told American Bishops that purgatory awaited any of them who did not cover up priestly child rape. Even among fellow Cardinals, he was known as "Joe the Rat".

But Ratzinger was a made to order object of hatred, and put there to play out the oldest game in politics: the venting of popular rage on a disposable figurehead so that the institution itself could proceed unscathed.

I doubt that it's totally coincidental that Ratzinger was forced out of office so quickly barely ten days after our Common Law court published online hard evidence of the Pope's involvement in crimes against humanity.

Any new Pope will face the same charges, of colluding in a massive criminal conspiracy.

But the real issue is not who or what will replace Joseph Ratzinger as the latest figurehead, but how to displace the Vatican itself as a criminal power unto itself. And that struggle is just commencing.

Thursday, 7 February 2013

Was Adam on SSDI in December?

Someone on Youtube claims he wasn't.
(Of course, this could be that the record was not submitted from the local authorities yet.) --

Aside: the SSDI does not mean Lanza collected Social Security money; it's his ID number record of death. (Someone was confused about that.)


IWillNotBeMute 2 days ago

This has been flagged as spam hide • Not Spam

I just checked it right now and it says Dec 14th. The very first time I checked it, back in December he wasn't on there at all.


by hollywoodpastels • 1,227 views

[Place to check for new info:]

Police: SH might have had multiple shooters


Sorry for the expression (emoticon) there.

Ahem ...



"In a shocking twist of events lending credence to theintelhub.com’s investigation, it has now been admitted by officials that there is a potential that multiple shooters carried out the bloody massacre that took place at the Sandy Hook Elementary School the morning of December 14, 2012."

And the source is:


Connecticut State's Attorney Stephen Sedensky has argued that unsealing warrants in the Sandy Hook case might "seriously jeopardize" the investigation by disclosing information known only to other "potential suspects." Sedensky said that unsealing the warrants would also: "identify persons cooperating with the investigation, thus possibly jeopardizing their personal safety and well-being."

And from me ...
{{{ Maybe the fact that Adam was registered as dead by the local funeral home ... but dead on Dec 13 and that's why the SSDI had him on there as Dec 13 ... kind of forced this talk/ admission. (Though they've now changed that date for his death.)


Maybe it's to confuse the fact so many police/ parent CNN interviews were in fact on green screen?

http://youcanknowsometimes.blogspot.ca/2013/01/police-gene-rosen-also-against-green.html }}}

How many open caskets, and for whom?

So far, I hear there was only one open casket.

It was Noah Pozner's. And he's described as having a CLOTH OVER THE LOWER HALF OF HIS FACE. The claim is that his lower face was blown off. If so, why was Mrs. Pozner so composed when interviewed by Anderson Cooper and Cooper's face in front of a green screen composite image? And why did the Pozners, very rich, put up a Facebook page for donations to the funeral "Noah's Ark of Hope Fund"??)



I have never heard of that -- usually if there's disfigurement, there's no open casket.

All right, for those who have "shock" knee jerk reactions, this next sentence is not for you ... (skip it):
Could it be (sorry to suggest: it was not my own thought!) that he was wax ... or not dead?

All right, the knee jerk reactors can keep reading.

Noah and Emilie are the two cases most filled in, most interviewed, most promoted for storylines (and this COULD be just a natural willingness of those families to give interviews). But if you were going to put out some or all fake death stories, you would need a few more "fleshed in" cases and most could be bare bones.

So let's think about the Pozners:

We know the mother, Veronique was shown NOT at the funeral with Anderson Cooper, but chatting in front of a green screen (as with several other cases of interviews). We also know the uncle of Noah is a high-profile lawyer for the Vatican, defending it against false child abuse cases (and of course even they need a defender); the whole family is rich, some connected to the UN powerhouse; and yet they put up a request for money donations to help with the funeral, at one point even asking for "even $1 would help" on Facebook, for the "Noah's Ark of Hope Fund".


And yes, I know the alternate possibility for Noah:

he was disfigured but they wanted to have the casket open;
and rich people need a fund, too, maybe, or some are crass;
and all the children were so generally disfigured that not only could there be no open caskets for all/ most of the others, but the parents who WANTED to see the children weren't "allowed" at all;
and that it's quite normal now to do all interviews for a huge event in front of green screens.

I know.

Friday, 1 February 2013

9/11 survivor claimant says: she's listed in SSDI

From Youtube comments at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRPvcflClM4&lc :

HoneySiegalSurvivor 4 days ago

MASSIVE FRAUD [on the SSDI for 9/11]! I know because Honey R Siegel [is] in the SSDI July 18, 2005. When I found my name misspelt purposely on the Security Title Agency transaction with the rum911(real unindicted mastermind of 911) I was astounded as to how Citibank in the New York Registrars Office was given a mortgage by "me". Eliot Spitzer former AG appraised of the fraud with Janet Napolitano former US attorney. The current Obama Rahm Bloomberg machine R Rico enterprises linked to 911WFB, FSB of me "dead". Honey Siegal

UPDATE Jul 8, 2013:
"This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated. Sorry about that."